From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754359Ab3HBQEK (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:04:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]:37869 "EHLO mail-ob0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754309Ab3HBQEI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:04:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:04:02 -0500 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] drop_caches: add some documentation and info message To: Andrew Morton Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , mhocko@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, bp@suse.de, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20130731201708.efa5ae87.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (from akpm@linux-foundation.org on Wed Jul 31 22:17:08 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.11 Message-Id: <1375459442.8422.1@driftwood> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/31/2013 10:17:08 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:11:50 -0400 KOSAKI Motohiro > wrote: > > > >> --- a/fs/drop_caches.c > > >> +++ b/fs/drop_caches.c > > >> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(ctl_table > *table, int write, > > >> if (ret) > > >> return ret; > > >> if (write) { > > >> + printk(KERN_INFO "%s (%d): dropped kernel > caches: %d\n", > > >> + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), > sysctl_drop_caches); > > >> if (sysctl_drop_caches & 1) > > >> iterate_supers(drop_pagecache_sb, NULL); > > >> if (sysctl_drop_caches & 2) > > > > > > How about we do > > > > > > if (!(sysctl_drop_caches & 4)) > > > printk(....) > > > > > > so people can turn it off if it's causing problems? > > > > The best interface depends on the purpose. If you want to detect > crazy application, > > we can't assume an application co-operate us. So, I doubt this > works. > > You missed the "!". I'm proposing that setting the new bit 2 will > permit people to prevent the new printk if it is causing them > problems. Or an alternative for those planning to patch it down to a KERN_DEBUG locally. I'd be surprised if anybody who does this sees the printk and thinks "hey, I'll dig into the VM's balancing logic and come up to speed on the tradeoffs sufficient to contribute to kernel development" because of something in dmesg. Anybody actually annoyed by it will chop out the printk (you barely need to know C to do that), the rest won't notice. Rob