Re: [PATCH 09/15] NTB: Use DMA Engine to Transmit and Receive

Jon Mason
2013-08-20T00:07:48Z

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:36:13PM +0000, Dan Williams wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/13 1:37 PM, "Jon Mason" <jon.mason@intel.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 03:01:54AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Jon Mason <jon.mason@intel.com> wrote:
> >> > Allocate and use a DMA engine channel to transmit and receive data
> >>over
> >> > NTB. If none is allocated, fall back to using the CPU to transfer
> >>data.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>
> >> > Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jon.mason@intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 17 +++
> >> > drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h | 1 +
> >> > drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c | 285
> >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> > 3 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> >> > index 1d8e551..014222c 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> >> > @@ -350,6 +350,23 @@ int ntb_read_remote_spad(struct ntb_device
> >>*ndev, unsigned int idx, u32 *val)
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > /**
> >> > + * ntb_get_mw_base() - get addr for the NTB memory window
> >> > + * @ndev: pointer to ntb_device instance
> >> > + * @mw: memory window number
> >> > + *
> >> > + * This function provides the base address of the memory window
> >>specified.
> >> > + *
> >> > + * RETURNS: address, or NULL on error.
> >> > + */
> >> > +resource_size_t ntb_get_mw_base(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned
> >>int mw)
> >> > +{
> >> > + if (mw >= ntb_max_mw(ndev))
> >> > + return 0;
> >> > +
> >> > + return pci_resource_start(ndev->pdev, MW_TO_BAR(mw));
> >> > +}
>
> Nothing does error checking on this return value. I think the code should
> either be sure that Œmw' is valid (mw_num is passed to the
> ntb_get_mw_vbase helper too) and delete the check, or at least make it a
> WARN_ONCE. The former seems a tad cleaner to me.

Ugh! Thanks.

>
>
> >> > +
> >> > +/**
> >> > * ntb_get_mw_vbase() - get virtual addr for the NTB memory window
> >> > * @ndev: pointer to ntb_device instance
> >> > * @mw: memory window number
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> >> > index b03de80..ab5f768 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> >> > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> >> > @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ int ntb_write_local_spad(struct ntb_device *ndev,
> >>unsigned int idx, u32 val);
> >> > int ntb_read_local_spad(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned int idx,
> >>u32 *val);
> >> > int ntb_write_remote_spad(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned int idx,
> >>u32 val);
> >> > int ntb_read_remote_spad(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned int idx,
> >>u32 *val);
> >> > +resource_size_t ntb_get_mw_base(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned
> >>int mw);
> >> > void __iomem *ntb_get_mw_vbase(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned int
> >>mw);
> >> > u64 ntb_get_mw_size(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned int mw);
> >> > void ntb_ring_sdb(struct ntb_device *ndev, unsigned int idx);
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> >> > index f7380e9..73a35e4 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> >> > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> >> > */
> >> > #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> >> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> >> > +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> >> > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> >> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> >> > #include <linux/export.h>
> >> > @@ -68,6 +69,10 @@ static unsigned char max_num_clients;
> >> > module_param(max_num_clients, byte, 0644);
> >> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_num_clients, "Maximum number of NTB transport
> >>clients");
> >> >
> >> > +static unsigned int copy_bytes = 1024;
> >> > +module_param(copy_bytes, uint, 0644);
> >> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(copy_bytes, "Threshold under which NTB will use the
> >>CPU to copy instead of DMA");
> >> > +
> >> > struct ntb_queue_entry {
> >> > /* ntb_queue list reference */
> >> > struct list_head entry;
> >> > @@ -76,6 +81,13 @@ struct ntb_queue_entry {
> >> > void *buf;
> >> > unsigned int len;
> >> > unsigned int flags;
> >> > +
> >> > + struct ntb_transport_qp *qp;
> >> > + union {
> >> > + struct ntb_payload_header __iomem *tx_hdr;
> >> > + struct ntb_payload_header *rx_hdr;
> >> > + };
> >> > + unsigned int index;
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > struct ntb_rx_info {
> >> > @@ -86,6 +98,7 @@ struct ntb_transport_qp {
> >> > struct ntb_transport *transport;
> >> > struct ntb_device *ndev;
> >> > void *cb_data;
> >> > + struct dma_chan *dma_chan;
> >> >
> >> > bool client_ready;
> >> > bool qp_link;
> >> > @@ -99,6 +112,7 @@ struct ntb_transport_qp {
> >> > struct list_head tx_free_q;
> >> > spinlock_t ntb_tx_free_q_lock;
> >> > void __iomem *tx_mw;
> >> > + dma_addr_t tx_mw_raw;
> >> > unsigned int tx_index;
> >> > unsigned int tx_max_entry;
> >> > unsigned int tx_max_frame;
> >> > @@ -114,6 +128,7 @@ struct ntb_transport_qp {
> >> > unsigned int rx_index;
> >> > unsigned int rx_max_entry;
> >> > unsigned int rx_max_frame;
> >> > + dma_cookie_t last_cookie;
> >> >
> >> > void (*event_handler) (void *data, int status);
> >> > struct delayed_work link_work;
> >> > @@ -129,9 +144,14 @@ struct ntb_transport_qp {
> >> > u64 rx_err_no_buf;
> >> > u64 rx_err_oflow;
> >> > u64 rx_err_ver;
> >> > + u64 rx_memcpy;
> >> > + u64 rx_async;
> >> > u64 tx_bytes;
> >> > u64 tx_pkts;
> >> > u64 tx_ring_full;
> >> > + u64 tx_err_no_buf;
> >> > + u64 tx_memcpy;
> >> > + u64 tx_async;
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > struct ntb_transport_mw {
> >> > @@ -381,7 +401,7 @@ static ssize_t debugfs_read(struct file *filp,
> >>char __user *ubuf, size_t count,
> >> > char *buf;
> >> > ssize_t ret, out_offset, out_count;
> >> >
> >> > - out_count = 600;
> >> > + out_count = 1000;
> >> >
> >> > buf = kmalloc(out_count, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > if (!buf)
> >> > @@ -396,6 +416,10 @@ static ssize_t debugfs_read(struct file *filp,
> >>char __user *ubuf, size_t count,
> >> > out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > "rx_pkts - \t%llu\n", qp->rx_pkts);
> >> > out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > + "rx_memcpy - \t%llu\n", qp->rx_memcpy);
> >> > + out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > + "rx_async - \t%llu\n", qp->rx_async);
> >> > + out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > "rx_ring_empty - %llu\n",
> >>qp->rx_ring_empty);
> >> > out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > "rx_err_no_buf - %llu\n",
> >>qp->rx_err_no_buf);
> >> > @@ -415,8 +439,14 @@ static ssize_t debugfs_read(struct file *filp,
> >>char __user *ubuf, size_t count,
> >> > out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > "tx_pkts - \t%llu\n", qp->tx_pkts);
> >> > out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > + "tx_memcpy - \t%llu\n", qp->tx_memcpy);
> >> > + out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > + "tx_async - \t%llu\n", qp->tx_async);
> >> > + out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > "tx_ring_full - \t%llu\n",
> >>qp->tx_ring_full);
> >> > out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > + "tx_err_no_buf - %llu\n",
> >>qp->tx_err_no_buf);
> >> > + out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > "tx_mw - \t%p\n", qp->tx_mw);
> >> > out_offset += snprintf(buf + out_offset, out_count -
> >>out_offset,
> >> > "tx_index - \t%u\n", qp->tx_index);
> >> > @@ -488,11 +518,11 @@ static void ntb_transport_setup_qp_mw(struct
> >>ntb_transport *nt,
> >> > num_qps_mw = nt->max_qps / mw_max;
> >> >
> >> > rx_size = (unsigned int) nt->mw[mw_num].size / num_qps_mw;
> >> > - qp->remote_rx_info = nt->mw[mw_num].virt_addr +
> >> > - (qp_num / mw_max * rx_size);
> >> > + qp->rx_buff = nt->mw[mw_num].virt_addr + qp_num / mw_max *
> >>rx_size;
> >> > rx_size -= sizeof(struct ntb_rx_info);
> >> >
> >> > - qp->rx_buff = qp->remote_rx_info + 1;
> >> > + qp->remote_rx_info = qp->rx_buff + rx_size;
> >> > +
> >> > /* Due to housekeeping, there must be atleast 2 buffs */
> >> > qp->rx_max_frame = min(transport_mtu, rx_size / 2);
> >> > qp->rx_max_entry = rx_size / qp->rx_max_frame;
> >> > @@ -802,6 +832,7 @@ static void ntb_transport_init_queue(struct
> >>ntb_transport *nt,
> >> > struct ntb_transport_qp *qp;
> >> > unsigned int num_qps_mw, tx_size;
> >> > u8 mw_num, mw_max;
> >> > + u64 qp_offset;
> >> >
> >> > mw_max = ntb_max_mw(nt->ndev);
> >> > mw_num = QP_TO_MW(nt->ndev, qp_num);
> >> > @@ -820,11 +851,12 @@ static void ntb_transport_init_queue(struct
> >>ntb_transport *nt,
> >> > num_qps_mw = nt->max_qps / mw_max;
> >> >
> >> > tx_size = (unsigned int) ntb_get_mw_size(qp->ndev, mw_num) /
> >>num_qps_mw;
> >> > - qp->rx_info = ntb_get_mw_vbase(nt->ndev, mw_num) +
> >> > - (qp_num / mw_max * tx_size);
> >> > + qp_offset = qp_num / mw_max * tx_size;
> >> > + qp->tx_mw = ntb_get_mw_vbase(nt->ndev, mw_num) + qp_offset;
> >> > + qp->tx_mw_raw = ntb_get_mw_base(qp->ndev, mw_num) + qp_offset;
> >>
> >> Just a quibble with the name, why "raw" instead of "phys"?
> >
> >What's in a name? ;-)
> >
> >phys is fine.
> >
> >>
> >> > tx_size -= sizeof(struct ntb_rx_info);
> >> > + qp->rx_info = qp->tx_mw + tx_size;
> >> >
> >> > - qp->tx_mw = qp->rx_info + 1;
> >> > /* Due to housekeeping, there must be atleast 2 buffs */
> >> > qp->tx_max_frame = min(transport_mtu, tx_size / 2);
> >> > qp->tx_max_entry = tx_size / qp->tx_max_frame;
> >> > @@ -956,13 +988,22 @@ void ntb_transport_free(void *transport)
> >> > kfree(nt);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > -static void ntb_rx_copy_task(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > - struct ntb_queue_entry *entry, void
> >>*offset)
> >> > +static void ntb_rx_copy_callback(void *data)
> >> > {
> >> > + struct ntb_queue_entry *entry = data;
> >> > + struct ntb_transport_qp *qp = entry->qp;
> >> > void *cb_data = entry->cb_data;
> >> > unsigned int len = entry->len;
> >> > + struct ntb_payload_header *hdr = entry->rx_hdr;
> >> > +
> >> > + wmb();
> >>
> >> What is this barrier paired with?
> >
> >You will see a wmb being removed from ntb_process_rxc below. It is
> >VERY necessary to be here.
>
> If it¹s not paired with a read barrier it needs a comment about what it is
> ordering. I thought checkpatch would squawk about this? I¹m curious why
> not a full read back to verify the write completes vs mmiowb()? wmb() is
> somewhere in the middle.

I'm pretty sure I ran all this through checkpatch before sending.
I'll re-add the comment I had before.

>
> >
> >> > + hdr->flags = 0;
> >> >
> >> > - memcpy(entry->buf, offset, entry->len);
> >> > + /* If the callbacks come out of order, the writing of the
> >>index to the
> >> > + * last completed will be out of order. This may result in
> >>the the
> >> > + * receive stalling forever.
> >> > + */
> >>
> >> Is this for the case where we are bouncing back and forth between
> >> sync/async? Otherwise I do not see how transactions could get out of
> >> order given you allocate a channel once per queue. Is this comment
> >> saying that the iowrite32 is somehow a fix, or is this comment a
> >> FIXME?
> >
> >There is a case for a mix, the "copy_bytes" variable above switches to
> >CPU for small transfers (which greatly increases throughput on small
> >transfers). The caveat to it is the need to flush the DMA engine to
> >prevent out-of-order. This comment is mainly an reminder of this issue.
>
> So this is going forward with the stall as a known issue? The next patch
> should just do the sync to prevent the re-ordering, right?

There is already a dma_sync_wait in the error path of ntb_async_rx to
enforce the ordering. Do I need to change the comment (or move it) to
make it more obvious what is happening?

> >
> >> > + iowrite32(entry->index, &qp->rx_info->entry);
> >> >
> >> > ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_rx_free_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> >>&qp->rx_free_q);
> >> >
> >> > @@ -970,6 +1011,80 @@ static void ntb_rx_copy_task(struct
> >>ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > qp->rx_handler(qp, qp->cb_data, cb_data, len);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +static void ntb_memcpy_rx(struct ntb_queue_entry *entry, void
> >>*offset)
> >> > +{
> >> > + void *buf = entry->buf;
> >> > + size_t len = entry->len;
> >> > +
> >> > + memcpy(buf, offset, len);
> >> > +
> >> > + ntb_rx_copy_callback(entry);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static void ntb_async_rx(struct ntb_queue_entry *entry, void *offset,
> >> > + size_t len)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
> >> > + struct ntb_transport_qp *qp = entry->qp;
> >> > + struct dma_chan *chan = qp->dma_chan;
> >> > + struct dma_device *device;
> >> > + dma_addr_t src, dest;
> >> > + dma_cookie_t cookie;
> >> > + void *buf = entry->buf;
> >> > + unsigned long flags;
> >> > +
> >> > + entry->len = len;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (!chan)
> >> > + goto err;
> >> > +
> >> > + device = chan->device;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (len < copy_bytes ||
> >> > + !is_dma_copy_aligned(device, __pa(offset), __pa(buf),
> >>len))
> >>
> >> __pa()'s necessary here? I don't think the alignment requirements
> >> will ever cross PAGE_OFFSET.
> >
> >The __pa calls cast the void* to an unsigned long, thus keeping
> >is_dma_copy_aligned happy.
>
> Then "(unsigned long) offset, (unsigned long) buf² right? Why munge the
> value?

Fair enough.

>
> >
> >> > + goto err1;
> >> > +
> >> > + dest = dma_map_single(device->dev, buf, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> >> > + if (dma_mapping_error(device->dev, dest))
> >> > + goto err1;
> >> > +
> >> > + src = dma_map_single(device->dev, offset, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> > + if (dma_mapping_error(device->dev, src))
> >> > + goto err2;
> >> > +
> >> > + flags = DMA_COMPL_DEST_UNMAP_SINGLE |
> >>DMA_COMPL_SRC_UNMAP_SINGLE |
> >> > + DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT;
> >> > + txd = device->device_prep_dma_memcpy(chan, dest, src, len,
> >>flags);
> >> > + if (!txd)
> >> > + goto err3;
> >> > +
> >> > + txd_clear_parent(txd);
> >> > + txd_clear_next(txd);
> >>
> >> Neither of these should be necessary.
> >
> >I had crashes in early versions of the code without them, but a quick
> >test with the removed doesn't show any issues. Good catch.
> >
> >> > + txd->callback = ntb_rx_copy_callback;
> >> > + txd->callback_param = entry;
> >> > +
> >> > + cookie = dmaengine_submit(txd);
> >> > + if (dma_submit_error(cookie))
> >> > + goto err3;
> >> > +
> >> > + qp->last_cookie = cookie;
> >> > +
> >> > + dma_async_issue_pending(chan);
> >>
> >> hmm... can this go in ntb_process_rx() so that the submission is
> >> batched? Cuts down on mmio.
> >
> >I moved it down to ntb_transport_rx (after the calls to
> >ntb_process_rxc), and the performance seems to be roughly the same.
>
> Yeah, not expecting it to be noticeable, but conceptually
>
> submit
> submit
> submit
> submit
> issue
>
>
> Is nicer than:
>
> submit
> issue
> submit
> issue
>
>

I agree, but I liked having all the dma engine awareness
compartmentalized in the ntb_async_* and callbacks.

>
>
>
> >
> >> > + qp->rx_async++;
> >> > +
> >> > + return;
> >> > +
> >> > +err3:
> >> > + dma_unmap_single(device->dev, src, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> > +err2:
> >> > + dma_unmap_single(device->dev, dest, len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> >> > +err1:
> >> > + dma_sync_wait(chan, qp->last_cookie);
> >> > +err:
> >> > + ntb_memcpy_rx(entry, offset);
> >> > + qp->rx_memcpy++;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > static int ntb_process_rxc(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp)
> >> > {
> >> > struct ntb_payload_header *hdr;
> >> > @@ -1008,41 +1123,44 @@ static int ntb_process_rxc(struct
> >>ntb_transport_qp *qp)
> >> > if (hdr->flags & LINK_DOWN_FLAG) {
> >> > ntb_qp_link_down(qp);
> >> >
> >> > - ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_rx_pend_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> >> > - &qp->rx_pend_q);
> >> > - goto out;
> >> > + goto err;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > dev_dbg(&ntb_query_pdev(qp->ndev)->dev,
> >> > "rx offset %u, ver %u - %d payload received, buf size
> >>%d\n",
> >> > qp->rx_index, hdr->ver, hdr->len, entry->len);
> >> >
> >> > - if (hdr->len <= entry->len) {
> >> > - entry->len = hdr->len;
> >> > - ntb_rx_copy_task(qp, entry, offset);
> >> > - } else {
> >> > - ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_rx_pend_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> >> > - &qp->rx_pend_q);
> >> > + qp->rx_bytes += hdr->len;
> >> > + qp->rx_pkts++;
> >> >
> >> > + if (hdr->len > entry->len) {
> >> > qp->rx_err_oflow++;
> >> > dev_dbg(&ntb_query_pdev(qp->ndev)->dev,
> >> > "RX overflow! Wanted %d got %d\n",
> >> > hdr->len, entry->len);
> >> > +
> >> > + goto err;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > - qp->rx_bytes += hdr->len;
> >> > - qp->rx_pkts++;
> >> > + entry->index = qp->rx_index;
> >> > + entry->rx_hdr = hdr;
> >> >
> >> > -out:
> >> > - /* Ensure that the data is fully copied out before clearing
> >>the flag */
> >> > - wmb();
> >> > - hdr->flags = 0;
> >> > - iowrite32(qp->rx_index, &qp->rx_info->entry);
> >> > + ntb_async_rx(entry, offset, hdr->len);
> >> >
> >> > +out:
> >> > qp->rx_index++;
> >> > qp->rx_index %= qp->rx_max_entry;
> >> >
> >> > return 0;
> >> > +
> >> > +err:
> >> > + ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_rx_pend_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> >> > + &qp->rx_pend_q);
> >> > + wmb();
> >> > + hdr->flags = 0;
> >> > + iowrite32(qp->rx_index, &qp->rx_info->entry);
> >> > +
> >> > + goto out;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > static void ntb_transport_rx(unsigned long data)
> >> > @@ -1070,19 +1188,12 @@ static void ntb_transport_rxc_db(void *data,
> >>int db_num)
> >> > tasklet_schedule(&qp->rx_work);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > -static void ntb_tx_copy_task(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > - struct ntb_queue_entry *entry,
> >> > - void __iomem *offset)
> >> > +static void ntb_tx_copy_callback(void *data)
> >> > {
> >> > - struct ntb_payload_header __iomem *hdr;
> >> > -
> >> > - memcpy_toio(offset, entry->buf, entry->len);
> >> > -
> >> > - hdr = offset + qp->tx_max_frame - sizeof(struct
> >>ntb_payload_header);
> >> > - iowrite32(entry->len, &hdr->len);
> >> > - iowrite32((u32) qp->tx_pkts, &hdr->ver);
> >> > + struct ntb_queue_entry *entry = data;
> >> > + struct ntb_transport_qp *qp = entry->qp;
> >> > + struct ntb_payload_header __iomem *hdr = entry->tx_hdr;
> >> >
> >> > - /* Ensure that the data is fully copied out before setting
> >>the flag */
> >> > wmb();
> >> > iowrite32(entry->flags | DESC_DONE_FLAG, &hdr->flags);
> >> >
> >> > @@ -1103,15 +1214,79 @@ static void ntb_tx_copy_task(struct
> >>ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_tx_free_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> >>&qp->tx_free_q);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > -static int ntb_process_tx(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > - struct ntb_queue_entry *entry)
> >> > +static void ntb_memcpy_tx(struct ntb_queue_entry *entry, void
> >>__iomem *offset)
> >> > +{
> >> > + memcpy_toio(offset, entry->buf, entry->len);
> >> > +
> >> > + ntb_tx_copy_callback(entry);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static void ntb_async_tx(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > + struct ntb_queue_entry *entry)
> >> > {
> >> > + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *txd;
> >> > + struct dma_chan *chan = qp->dma_chan;
> >> > + struct dma_device *device;
> >> > + dma_addr_t src, dest;
> >> > + dma_cookie_t cookie;
> >> > + struct ntb_payload_header __iomem *hdr;
> >> > void __iomem *offset;
> >> > + size_t len = entry->len;
> >> > + void *buf = entry->buf;
> >> > + unsigned long flags;
> >> >
> >> > offset = qp->tx_mw + qp->tx_max_frame * qp->tx_index;
> >> > + hdr = offset + qp->tx_max_frame - sizeof(struct
> >>ntb_payload_header);
> >> > + entry->tx_hdr = hdr;
> >> > +
> >> > + iowrite32(entry->len, &hdr->len);
> >> > + iowrite32((u32) qp->tx_pkts, &hdr->ver);
> >> > +
> >> > + if (!chan)
> >> > + goto err;
> >> >
> >> > - dev_dbg(&ntb_query_pdev(qp->ndev)->dev, "%lld - offset %p, tx
> >>%u, entry len %d flags %x buff %p\n",
> >> > - qp->tx_pkts, offset, qp->tx_index, entry->len,
> >>entry->flags,
> >> > + device = chan->device;
> >> > +
> >> > + dest = qp->tx_mw_raw + qp->tx_max_frame * qp->tx_index;
> >> > +
> >> > + if (len < copy_bytes ||
> >> > + !is_dma_copy_aligned(device, __pa(buf), dest, len))
> >>
> >> ditto on the use of __pa here.
> >>
> >> > + goto err;
> >> > +
> >> > + src = dma_map_single(device->dev, buf, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> > + if (dma_mapping_error(device->dev, src))
> >> > + goto err;
> >> > +
> >> > + flags = DMA_COMPL_SRC_UNMAP_SINGLE | DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT;
> >> > + txd = device->device_prep_dma_memcpy(chan, dest, src, len,
> >>flags);
> >> > + if (!txd)
> >> > + goto err1;
> >> > +
> >> > + txd_clear_parent(txd);
> >> > + txd_clear_next(txd);
> >>
> >> ...again not needed.
> >>
> >> > + txd->callback = ntb_tx_copy_callback;
> >> > + txd->callback_param = entry;
> >> > +
> >> > + cookie = dmaengine_submit(txd);
> >> > + if (dma_submit_error(cookie))
> >> > + goto err1;
> >> > +
> >> > + dma_async_issue_pending(chan);
> >> > + qp->tx_async++;
> >> > +
> >> > + return;
> >> > +err1:
> >> > + dma_unmap_single(device->dev, src, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >> > +err:
> >> > + ntb_memcpy_tx(entry, offset);
> >> > + qp->tx_memcpy++;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static int ntb_process_tx(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > + struct ntb_queue_entry *entry)
> >> > +{
> >> > + dev_dbg(&ntb_query_pdev(qp->ndev)->dev, "%lld - tx %u, entry
> >>len %d flags %x buff %p\n",
> >> > + qp->tx_pkts, qp->tx_index, entry->len, entry->flags,
> >> > entry->buf);
> >> > if (qp->tx_index == qp->remote_rx_info->entry) {
> >> > qp->tx_ring_full++;
> >> > @@ -1127,7 +1302,7 @@ static int ntb_process_tx(struct
> >>ntb_transport_qp *qp,
> >> > return 0;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > - ntb_tx_copy_task(qp, entry, offset);
> >> > + ntb_async_tx(qp, entry);
> >> >
> >> > qp->tx_index++;
> >> > qp->tx_index %= qp->tx_max_entry;
> >> > @@ -1213,11 +1388,16 @@ ntb_transport_create_queue(void *data, struct
> >>pci_dev *pdev,
> >> > qp->tx_handler = handlers->tx_handler;
> >> > qp->event_handler = handlers->event_handler;
> >> >
> >> > + qp->dma_chan = dma_find_channel(DMA_MEMCPY);
> >> > + if (!qp->dma_chan)
> >> > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Unable to allocate private DMA
> >>channel, using CPU instead\n");
> >>
> >> You can drop "private" since this is a public allocation.
> >
> >Good catch
> >
> >> > +
> >> > for (i = 0; i < NTB_QP_DEF_NUM_ENTRIES; i++) {
> >> > entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ntb_queue_entry),
> >>GFP_ATOMIC);
> >> > if (!entry)
> >> > goto err1;
> >> >
> >> > + entry->qp = qp;
> >> > ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_rx_free_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> >> > &qp->rx_free_q);
> >> > }
> >> > @@ -1227,6 +1407,7 @@ ntb_transport_create_queue(void *data, struct
> >>pci_dev *pdev,
> >> > if (!entry)
> >> > goto err2;
> >> >
> >> > + entry->qp = qp;
> >> > ntb_list_add(&qp->ntb_tx_free_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> >> > &qp->tx_free_q);
> >> > }
> >> > @@ -1272,11 +1453,14 @@ void ntb_transport_free_queue(struct
> >>ntb_transport_qp *qp)
> >> >
> >> > pdev = ntb_query_pdev(qp->ndev);
> >> >
> >> > - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&qp->link_work);
> >> > + if (qp->dma_chan)
> >> > + dmaengine_terminate_all(qp->dma_chan);
> >>
> >> Do you need this or can you just wait for all outstanding tx / rx to
> >>quiesce?
> >
> >I'd prefer not to spin in the shutdown code waiting for the channel to
> >quiesce. I suppose I could be nice and give it a small time to do so,
> >before I smash it in the head with a rock.
>
> But ->device_control is not a mandatory operation. You¹re already sync
> waiting for the workqueue to die.

I added it and I do think it will be a little nicer

Thanks,
Jon

>
> >
> >> > ntb_unregister_db_callback(qp->ndev, qp->qp_num);
> >> > tasklet_disable(&qp->rx_work);
> >> >
> >> > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&qp->link_work);
> >> > +
> >> > while ((entry = ntb_list_rm(&qp->ntb_rx_free_q_lock,
> >>&qp->rx_free_q)))
> >> > kfree(entry);
> >> >
> >> > @@ -1382,8 +1566,10 @@ int ntb_transport_tx_enqueue(struct
> >>ntb_transport_qp *qp, void *cb, void *data,
> >> > return -EINVAL;
> >> >
> >> > entry = ntb_list_rm(&qp->ntb_tx_free_q_lock, &qp->tx_free_q);
> >> > - if (!entry)
> >> > + if (!entry) {
> >> > + qp->tx_err_no_buf++;
> >> > return -ENOMEM;
> >> > + }
> >> >
> >> > entry->cb_data = cb;
> >> > entry->buf = data;
> >> > @@ -1499,9 +1685,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ntb_transport_qp_num);
> >> > */
> >> > unsigned int ntb_transport_max_size(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp)
> >> > {
> >> > + unsigned int max;
> >> > +
> >> > if (!qp)
> >> > return 0;
> >> >
> >> > - return qp->tx_max_frame - sizeof(struct ntb_payload_header);
> >> > + if (!qp->dma_chan)
> >> > + return qp->tx_max_frame - sizeof(struct
> >>ntb_payload_header);
> >> > +
> >> > + /* If DMA engine usage is possible, try to find the max size
> >>for that */
> >> > + max = qp->tx_max_frame - sizeof(struct ntb_payload_header);
> >> > + max -= max % (1 << qp->dma_chan->device->copy_align);
> >>
> >> Unless I missed it you need a dmaengine_get() dmaengine_put() pair in
> >> your driver setup/teardown. dmaengine_get() notifies dmaengine of a
> >> dma_find_channel() user.
> >
> >Good catch.
> >
> >Thanks for the review! I'll make the changes and do another spin of
> >the patch.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Jon
>