From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754861Ab3HRBie (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:38:34 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:43183 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753868Ab3HRBiK (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:38:10 -0400 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, Tejun Heo , "Paul E. McKenney" , "David S. Miller" , Li Zefan , Patrick McHardy , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rculist: list_first_or_null_rcu() should use list_entry_rcu() Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:37:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1376789876-27594-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.5 In-Reply-To: <1376789876-27594-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20130818013735.GA27234@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1376789876-27594-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13081801-7606-0000-0000-00000E6C106A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tejun Heo list_first_or_null() should test whether the list is empty and return pointer to the first entry if not in a RCU safe manner. It's broken in several ways. * It compares __kernel @__ptr with __rcu @__next triggering the following sparse warning. net/core/dev.c:4331:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces) * It doesn't perform rcu_dereference*() and computes the entry address using container_of() directly from the __rcu pointer which is inconsitent with other rculist interface. As a result, all three in-kernel users - net/core/dev.c, macvlan, cgroup - are buggy. They dereference the pointer w/o going through read barrier. * While ->next dereference passes through list_next_rcu(), the compiler is still free to fetch ->next more than once and thus nullify the "__ptr != __next" condition check. Fix it by making list_first_or_null_rcu() dereference ->next directly using ACCESS_ONCE() and then use list_entry_rcu() on it like other rculist accessors. v2: Paul pointed out that the compiler may fetch the pointer more than once nullifying the condition check. ACCESS_ONCE() added on ->next dereference. v3: Restored () around macro param which was accidentally removed. Spotted by Paul. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Fengguang Wu Cc: Dipankar Sarma Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Li Zefan Cc: Patrick McHardy Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- include/linux/rculist.h | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h index f4b1001..4106721 100644 --- a/include/linux/rculist.h +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h @@ -267,8 +267,9 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, */ #define list_first_or_null_rcu(ptr, type, member) \ ({struct list_head *__ptr = (ptr); \ - struct list_head __rcu *__next = list_next_rcu(__ptr); \ - likely(__ptr != __next) ? container_of(__next, type, member) : NULL; \ + struct list_head *__next = ACCESS_ONCE(__ptr->next); \ + likely(__ptr != __next) ? \ + list_entry_rcu(__next, type, member) : NULL; \ }) /** -- 1.8.1.5