linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	sbw@mit.edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/9] nohz_full: Add testing information to documentation
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:47:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376966841-31774-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376966841-31774-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit adds information about testing nohz_full, and also emphasizes
the fact that you need a multi-CPU system to get any benefit from nohz_full.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
---
 Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt b/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt
index 8869758..cca122f 100644
--- a/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt
+++ b/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ There are three main ways of managing scheduling-clock interrupts
 	workloads, you will normally -not- want this option.
 
 These three cases are described in the following three sections, followed
-by a third section on RCU-specific considerations and a fourth and final
-section listing known issues.
+by a third section on RCU-specific considerations, a fourth section
+discussing testing, and a fifth and final section listing known issues.
 
 
 NEVER OMIT SCHEDULING-CLOCK TICKS
@@ -121,14 +121,15 @@ boot parameter specifies the adaptive-ticks CPUs.  For example,
 "nohz_full=1,6-8" says that CPUs 1, 6, 7, and 8 are to be adaptive-ticks
 CPUs.  Note that you are prohibited from marking all of the CPUs as
 adaptive-tick CPUs:  At least one non-adaptive-tick CPU must remain
-online to handle timekeeping tasks in order to ensure that system calls
-like gettimeofday() returns accurate values on adaptive-tick CPUs.
-(This is not an issue for CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y because there are no
-running user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.)
-Therefore, the boot CPU is prohibited from entering adaptive-ticks
-mode.  Specifying a "nohz_full=" mask that includes the boot CPU will
-result in a boot-time error message, and the boot CPU will be removed
-from the mask.
+online to handle timekeeping tasks in order to ensure that system
+calls like gettimeofday() returns accurate values on adaptive-tick CPUs.
+(This is not an issue for CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y because there are no running
+user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.)  Therefore, the
+boot CPU is prohibited from entering adaptive-ticks mode.  Specifying a
+"nohz_full=" mask that includes the boot CPU will result in a boot-time
+error message, and the boot CPU will be removed from the mask.  Note that
+this means that your system must have at least two CPUs in order for
+CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y to do anything for you.
 
 Alternatively, the CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=y Kconfig parameter specifies
 that all CPUs other than the boot CPU are adaptive-ticks CPUs.  This
@@ -232,6 +233,29 @@ scheduler will decide where to run them, which might or might not be
 where you want them to run.
 
 
+TESTING
+
+So you enable all the OS-jitter features described in this document,
+but do not see any change in your workload's behavior.  Is this because
+your workload isn't affected that much by OS jitter, or is it because
+something else is in the way?  This section helps answer this question
+by providing a simple OS-jitter test suite, which is available on branch
+master of the following git archive:
+
+git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/dynticks-testing.git
+
+Clone this archive and follow the instructions in the README file.
+This test procedure will produce a trace that will allow you to evaluate
+whether or not you have succeeded in removing OS jitter from your system.
+If this trace shows that you have removed OS jitter as much as is
+possible, then you can conclude that your workload is not all that
+sensitive to OS jitter.
+
+Note: this test requires that your system have at least two CPUs.
+We do not currently have a good way to remove OS jitter from single-CPU
+systems.
+
+
 KNOWN ISSUES
 
 o	Dyntick-idle slows transitions to and from idle slightly.
-- 
1.8.1.5


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-20  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-20  2:47 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] v2 sysidle changes for 3.12 Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Eliminate unused APIs intended for adaptive ticks Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:47   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-08-20  2:47   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/9] nohz_full: Add Kconfig parameter for scalable detection of all-idle state Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:47   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/9] nohz_full: Add rcu_dyntick data " Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:47   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/9] nohz_full: Add per-CPU idle-state tracking Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:47   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] nohz_full: Add full-system idle states and variables Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:47   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle arguments to API Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-20  2:47   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle state machine Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-26  5:45     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-08-26 16:24       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-27  3:41         ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-08-31 21:20           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-06  8:08     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-06 17:30       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-06 18:50         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-06 19:32           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-07 11:22           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-07 18:59             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-07  9:13         ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-09-07 18:57           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-08 10:32             ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-09-08 10:46               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-20  2:47   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 9/9] nohz_full: Force RCU's grace-period kthreads onto timekeeping CPU Paul E. McKenney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-18  1:49 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] sysidle changes for v3.12 Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18  1:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Eliminate unused APIs intended for adaptive ticks Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-18  1:49   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/9] nohz_full: Add testing information to documentation Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1376966841-31774-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).