From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751767Ab3HTUC2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:02:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]:64963 "EHLO mail-ob0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751463Ab3HTUC1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:02:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:02:24 -0500 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths? To: Joe Perches Cc: Jiri Kosina , LKML , kernel-janitors References: <1376944033.2016.13.camel@joe-AO722> <1376946644.2016.35.camel@joe-AO722> <1376947637.2016.39.camel@joe-AO722> In-Reply-To: <1376947637.2016.39.camel@joe-AO722> (from joe@perches.com on Mon Aug 19 16:27:17 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.11 Message-Id: <1377028944.2737.75@driftwood> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/19/2013 04:27:17 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 23:22 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > This is a 7 line patch that corrects logging defects that has had > no > > > reply from you for the last month. > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833648/ > > > > This hasn't missed any Linus' major release, as it has been > submitted post > > 3.11 merge, right? (hint, that was Jul 4th). > > > > If this would miss *next* major Linus' release, I would accept your > > complaints. But this is definitely not the case. > > You're suggesting this patch, which corrects obvious > defects, should miss 3.12 and go into 3.13? > > I think that's wrong. Correcting obvious defects, which can't wait a release, is "trivial" now, is it? Rob