From: Liu Ping Fan <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: ioapic needs check attr when programmed more than once
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:46:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377161197-3175-1-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
When programming ioapic pinX more than once, current code
does not check whether the later attr (trigger&polarity) is the
same as the former or not. This causes a broken semantic.
Fix it by reporting -EBUSY, when attr is different.
Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 7 ++++++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 230c8ea..9ef2ce9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1113,6 +1113,7 @@ int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
int ioapic;
int ioapic_pin;
struct io_apic_irq_attr irq_attr;
+ int ret;
if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC)
return gsi;
@@ -1142,7 +1143,9 @@ int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
set_io_apic_irq_attr(&irq_attr, ioapic, ioapic_pin,
trigger == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 0 : 1,
polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
- io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, gsi_to_irq(gsi), &irq_attr);
+ ret = io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, gsi_to_irq(gsi), &irq_attr);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ gsi = INT_MIN;
return gsi;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 9ed796c..ce31d902 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -3375,12 +3375,17 @@ int io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once(unsigned int irq, int node,
{
unsigned int ioapic_idx = attr->ioapic, pin = attr->ioapic_pin;
int ret;
+ struct IO_APIC_route_entry orig;
/* Avoid redundant programming */
if (test_bit(pin, ioapics[ioapic_idx].pin_programmed)) {
pr_debug("Pin %d-%d already programmed\n",
mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic_idx), pin);
- return 0;
+ orig = ioapic_read_entry(attr->ioapic, pin);
+ if (attr->trigger == orig.trigger &&
+ attr->polarity == orig.polarity)
+ return 0;
+ return -EBUSY;
}
ret = io_apic_setup_irq_pin(irq, node, attr);
if (!ret)
--
1.8.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 8:46 Liu Ping Fan [this message]
2013-08-23 7:30 ` [PATCH] x86: ioapic needs check attr when programmed more than once Ingo Molnar
2013-08-23 8:04 ` Liu ping fan
2013-08-23 8:09 ` Liu ping fan
2013-08-23 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-23 8:58 Liu Ping Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1377161197-3175-1-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox