From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755580Ab3H2CFQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:05:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:35303 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754253Ab3H2CFM (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:05:12 -0400 Message-ID: <1377741906.16018.1.camel@phoenix> Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: Remove ti prefix in dev_err messages From: Axel Lin To: Linus Walleij Cc: Laxman Dewangan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:05:06 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It does not make sense to show ti prefix in pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map() dev_err messages. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin --- drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c index 2c62225..55a0ebe 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.c @@ -256,8 +256,7 @@ int pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, if (ret < 0) { /* EINVAL=missing, which is fine since it's optional */ if (ret != -EINVAL) - dev_err(dev, - "could not parse property ti,function\n"); + dev_err(dev, "could not parse property function\n"); function = NULL; } @@ -274,7 +273,7 @@ int pinconf_generic_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, reserve++; ret = of_property_count_strings(np, "pins"); if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(dev, "could not parse property ti,pins\n"); + dev_err(dev, "could not parse property pins\n"); goto exit; } reserve *= ret; -- 1.8.1.2