From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
pjt@google.com, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com,
aswin@hp.com, scott.norton@hp.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 3/3] sched: Periodically decay max cost of idle balance
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:10:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378278601.3004.60.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130830101817.GE10002@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 12:18 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:05:36PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 58b0514..bba5a07 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ ttwu_do_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
> >
> > if (rq->idle_stamp) {
> > u64 delta = rq_clock(rq) - rq->idle_stamp;
> > - u64 max = 2*rq->max_idle_balance_cost;
> > + u64 max = 2*(sysctl_sched_migration_cost + rq->max_idle_balance_cost);
>
> You re-introduce sched_migration_cost here because max_idle_balance_cost
> can now drop down to 0 again?
Yes it was so that max_idle_balance_cost would be at least sched_migration_cost
and that we would still skip idle_balance if avg_idle < sched_migration_cost.
I also initially thought that adding sched_migration_cost would also account for
the extra "costs" of idle balancing that are not accounted for in the time spent
on each newidle load balance. Come to think of it though, sched_migration_cost
might be too large when used in that context considering we're already using the
max cost.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 20:05 [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Limiting idle balance Jason Low
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: Reduce overestimating rq->avg_idle Jason Low
2013-09-02 6:36 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: Consider max cost of idle balance per sched domain Jason Low
2013-08-30 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-02 6:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-09-03 21:06 ` Jason Low
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH v4 3/3] sched: Periodically decay max cost of idle balance Jason Low
2013-08-30 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-30 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-04 6:02 ` Jason Low
2013-09-09 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 20:40 ` Jason Low
2013-09-04 7:10 ` Jason Low [this message]
2013-09-09 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 21:07 ` Jason Low
2013-09-10 1:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-12 10:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Limiting " Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378278601.3004.60.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox