From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
David Lang <david@lang.hm>,
"Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:32:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378891972.6193.137.camel@linux-s257.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378837571.17615.0.camel@x230.lan>
於 二，2013-09-10 於 18:26 +0000，Matthew Garrett 提到：
> On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 14:23 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > That's why modern systems require signed firmware updates.
> >
> > Linux doesn't. Is someone working on adding signature support to the
> > runtime firmware loader?
>
> It'd be simple to do so, but so far the model appears to be that devices
> that expect signed firmware enforce that themselves.
>
> --
> Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
> NrybXǧv^){.n+{y^nrz\x1ah&\x1eGh\x03(階ݢj"\x1a^[mzޖfh~m
Takashi has a implementation of firmware check:
[PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Add firmware signature file check
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/8/343
Thanks
Joey Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-11 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-09 15:49 [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] Add BSD-style securelevel support Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 16:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 16:30 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 16:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 16:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 16:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 16:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 18:31 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 02/12] Enforce module signatures when securelevel is greater than 0 Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 03/12] PCI: Lock down BAR access when securelevel is enabled Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86: Lock down IO port " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 05/12] Restrict /dev/mem and /dev/kmem when securelevel is set Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] acpi: Limit access to custom_method if " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter when " Matthew Garrett
2013-11-26 12:54 ` Josh Boyer
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 08/12] kexec: Disable at runtime if securelevel has been set Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] uswsusp: Disable when securelevel is set Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86: Restrict MSR access " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] asus-wmi: Restrict debugfs interface " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 15:49 ` [PATCH 12/12] Add option to automatically set securelevel when in Secure Boot mode Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 17:18 ` [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown Valdis.Kletnieks
2013-09-09 17:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 18:25 ` David Lang
2013-09-09 18:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 18:40 ` David Lang
2013-09-09 18:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 18:53 ` David Lang
2013-09-09 19:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 19:59 ` David Lang
2013-09-09 20:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 20:15 ` David Lang
2013-09-09 20:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 19:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2013-09-09 19:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 19:52 ` Josh Boyer
2013-09-09 19:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 19:58 ` Josh Boyer
2013-09-09 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 20:10 ` David Lang
2013-09-09 20:13 ` Josh Boyer
2013-09-09 23:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 23:19 ` David Lang
2013-09-09 23:20 ` Kees Cook
2013-09-09 23:30 ` James Bottomley
2013-09-09 23:34 ` Kees Cook
2013-09-10 0:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-10 2:44 ` David Lang
2013-09-10 2:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-10 3:09 ` David Lang
2013-09-10 3:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-10 17:23 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-09-10 18:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-10 18:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-10 18:51 ` gregkh
2013-09-10 18:55 ` Kees Cook
2013-09-10 19:17 ` David Lang
2013-09-10 19:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-10 23:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-09-10 23:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-10 23:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-09-10 23:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-10 18:48 ` Kees Cook
2013-09-11 9:32 ` joeyli [this message]
2013-09-09 20:30 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378891972.6193.137.camel@linux-s257.site \
--to=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox