From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:06:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1379340373-5135-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
Paul Gortmaker reported a BUG on preempt-rt kernels, due to taking the
mmu_lock within the raw kvm_lock in mmu_shrink_scan. He provided a
patch that shrunk the kvm_lock critical section so that the mmu_lock
critical section does not nest with it, but in the end there is no reason
for the vm_list to be protected by a raw spinlock. Only manipulations
of kvm_usage_count and the consequent hardware_enable/disable operations
are not preemptable.
This small series thus splits the kvm_lock in the "raw" part and the
"non-raw" part.
Paul, could you please provide your Tested-by?
Thanks,
Paolo
Paolo Bonzini (3):
KVM: cleanup (physical) CPU hotplug
KVM: protect kvm_usage_count with its own spinlock
KVM: Convert kvm_lock back to non-raw spinlock
Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt | 8 ++++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 4 +--
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 +++---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-16 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-16 14:06 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-09-16 14:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: cleanup (physical) CPU hotplug Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-17 7:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-09-17 23:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-16 14:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: protect kvm_usage_count with its own spinlock Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-16 14:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: Convert kvm_lock back to non-raw spinlock Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-16 22:12 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Make kvm_lock non-raw Paul Gortmaker
2013-09-20 17:51 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-09-20 18:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-09-20 18:18 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-09-20 18:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-09-21 20:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-22 7:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-22 8:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-22 9:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-23 6:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-09-23 13:36 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-09-23 13:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-23 14:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-23 15:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1379340373-5135-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).