From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] irq: Improve a bit softirq debugging
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:18:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380125886-10341-5-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380125886-10341-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
do_softirq() has a debug check that verifies that it is not nesting
on softirqs processing, nor miscounting the softirq part of the preempt
count.
But making sure that softirqs processing don't nest is actually a more
generic concern that applies to any caller of __do_softirq().
Do take it one step further and generalize that debug check to
any softirq processing.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 17c5cd2..9f8092b 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_disable);
static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
if (softirq_count() == cnt)
@@ -148,6 +147,7 @@ static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt)
*/
void _local_bh_enable(void)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET);
}
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ restart:
account_irq_exit_time(current);
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
tsk_restore_flags(current, old_flags, PF_MEMALLOC);
}
@@ -299,7 +300,6 @@ asmlinkage void do_softirq(void)
if (pending)
do_softirq_own_stack();
- WARN_ON_ONCE(softirq_count());
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 16:17 [RFC PATCH 0/7] softirq: Consolidation and stack overrun fix v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] irq: Force hardirq exit's softirq processing on its own stack Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] irq: Consolidate do_softirq() arch overriden implementations Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] irq: Optimize call to softirq on hardirq exit Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] irq: Justify the various softirq stack choices Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] irq: Optimize softirq stack selection in irq exit Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-26 7:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86: Tell about irq stack coverage Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 23:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-26 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 0:40 ` Joe Perches
2013-09-26 1:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-26 2:00 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for #defines of ARCH_HAS_<foo> Joe Perches
2013-09-26 2:32 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 2:40 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380125886-10341-5-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox