From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] irq: Justify the various softirq stack choices
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:18:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380125886-10341-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380125886-10341-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
For clarity, comment the various stack choices for softirqs
processing, whether we execute them from ksoftirqd or
local_irq_enable() calls.
Their use on irq_exit() is already commented.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 9f8092b..2b4328e 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -170,8 +170,13 @@ static inline void _local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip)
*/
sub_preempt_count(SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET - 1);
- if (unlikely(!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending()))
+ if (unlikely(!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())) {
+ /*
+ * Run softirq if any pending. And do it in its own stack
+ * as we may be calling this deep in a task call stack already.
+ */
do_softirq();
+ }
dec_preempt_count();
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
@@ -769,6 +774,10 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int cpu)
{
local_irq_disable();
if (local_softirq_pending()) {
+ /*
+ * We can safely run softirq on inline stack, as we are not deep
+ * in the task stack here.
+ */
__do_softirq();
rcu_note_context_switch(cpu);
local_irq_enable();
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 16:17 [RFC PATCH 0/7] softirq: Consolidation and stack overrun fix v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] irq: Force hardirq exit's softirq processing on its own stack Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] irq: Consolidate do_softirq() arch overriden implementations Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] irq: Optimize call to softirq on hardirq exit Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] irq: Improve a bit softirq debugging Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] irq: Optimize softirq stack selection in irq exit Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 23:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-26 7:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 16:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86: Tell about irq stack coverage Frederic Weisbecker
2013-09-25 23:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-26 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 0:40 ` Joe Perches
2013-09-26 1:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-26 2:00 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for #defines of ARCH_HAS_<foo> Joe Perches
2013-09-26 2:32 ` Andrew Morton
2013-09-26 2:40 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380125886-10341-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox