Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review

Shuah Khan
2013-10-04T00:16:26Z

On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings and
3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly.

Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2
Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed
Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed
dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions
compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit,
alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Test systems

Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later)
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2 (cross-compile
testing)

Cross-compile tests results

alpha defconfig Passed
arm defconfig Passed
arm64 defconfig Not applicable
blackfin defconfig Passed
c6x defconfig Not applicable
mips defconfig Passed
mipsel defconfig Passed
powerpc wii_defconfig Passed
sh defconfig Passed
sparc defconfig Passed
tile tilegx_defconfig Passed

-- Shuah

--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658