Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review

Guenter Roeck
2013-10-03T21:18:28Z

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/02/2013 09:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> > > There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> >
> > Heads up: I am getting lots of build failures in 3.0 and 3.4 builds.
> >
> > mm/built-in.o: In function `__put_compound_page':
> > slab.c:(.text+0xaa3c): undefined reference to `PageHuge'
> > mm/built-in.o: In function `put_compound_page':
> > slab.c:(.text+0xaab0): undefined reference to `PageHuge'
> > mm/built-in.o: In function `__get_page_tail':
> > slab.c:(.text+0xb178): undefined reference to `PageHuge'
> > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
> >
> > More tomorrow.
>
> Should now be fixed, if not, please let me know.
>
Yes, much better:
total: 98 pass: 71 skipped: 16 fail: 11
This matches the results from the previous release.

qemu tests also pass.

Details are at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders, as usual.

Thanks,
Guenter