Re: [ 00/13] 3.0.99-stable review

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-04T02:44:07Z

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 10:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.99 release.
> >There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:03:47 UTC 2013.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.99-rc1.gz
> >and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
>
> Patch testing: 3.0.99-rc1 patch applied with white-space warnings
> and 3.0.99-rc2 applied cleanly.
>
> Tested 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2
> Compile testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed
> Boot testing: 3.0.99-rc1 and 3.0.99-rc2 Passed
> dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions
> compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit,
> alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Thanks for testing both of these, sorry for the mess with -rc2.

greg k-h