public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: add PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA to linker script
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:31:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381339905.8305.31.camel@deneb.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131009101447.GC5985@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 11:14 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:37:39PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> > The arm64 linker script doesn't use the PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA macro which
> > leads to a ".data..page_aligned" section being placed between the end
> > of .data and start of .bss:
> > 
> >  % readelf -e vmlinux
> >    ...
> >  Section to Segment mapping:
> >   Segment Sections...
> >    00     .head.text .text .text.init .rodata __ksymtab __ksymtab_gpl \
> >           __ksymtab_strings __param __modver __ex_table .notes \
> >           .init.text .init.data .data..percpu .data .data..page_aligned .bss
> > 
> > This causes problems for the EFI stub which may have to relocate the
> > kernel image based on stext and _edata symbols.
> > 
> > This patch adds PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA() to the linker script inside the
> > the .data section.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> > index f8ab9d8..e441556 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ SECTIONS
> >  		 */
> >  		INIT_TASK_DATA(THREAD_SIZE)
> >  		NOSAVE_DATA
> > +		PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA(PAGE_SIZE)
> >  		CACHELINE_ALIGNED_DATA(64)
> >  		READ_MOSTLY_DATA(64)
> 
> Can we just replace this chunk with RW_DATA_SECTION(64, PAGE_SIZE,
> THREAD_SIZE) instead?

Possibly. The layout of the included macros is the same. The only
difference being the placement of _data, _sdata, and _edata inside
.data and the use of __data_loc.

--Mark



  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-09 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-08 20:37 [PATCH] arm64: add PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA to linker script Mark Salter
2013-10-09 10:14 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-09 17:31   ` Mark Salter [this message]
2013-10-11 12:18   ` Mark Salter
2013-11-01 15:01     ` Mark Salter
2013-11-01 16:17       ` Will Deacon
2013-11-04 11:28     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-11-04 16:38       ` [PATCH] arm64: use generic RW_DATA_SECTION macro in " Mark Salter
2013-11-04 17:20         ` Will Deacon
2013-11-04 18:19         ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1381339905.8305.31.camel@deneb.redhat.com \
    --to=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox