From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: sysfs for my chips
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:19:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381378788.4330.30.camel@pasglop> (raw)
Hi Greg !
(random CC list of clueful people)
On some new powerpc platforms (non-hypervisor or rather linux is the
hypervisor), I want to expose a bunch of stuff per "chip", the chips
being currently the processor chips and the "centaurs" (think of them as
the bottom half of the memory controllers).
Among other, I want a sysfs file in there to access "xscom" on the chip
which is a sideband bus used for low level stuff (think jtag on steroid)
which we can use, among others, for chip health monitoring, general
debugging and diagnostics, etc...
I might add more such as VPD, model information, etc... later or at
least a link to corresponding device-tree node.
How do you suggest I expose that ? So far I've been thinking about
something like
/sys/chips/{processor,centaur}/chip#/files
or to avoid namespace clashes
/sys/firmware/chips/{processor,centaur}/chip#/files
Or maybe just
/sys/firmware/chips/chip#/files
(the chip type can be inferred from the chip#, they use the same space
at least as far my firmware exposes them to Linux)
(the actual access to xscom goes via firmware tho it makes *some* sense)
But I could instead create platform devices corresponding to the
device-tree representation of each of those chips ... and have the
platform devices contain the magic attributes. That's a bit more
convoluted though.
What's the current trend of the day for that sort of thing ? I'd rather
avoid yet-another-chardev-with-ioctl's here ...
Cheers,
Ben.
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 4:19 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2013-10-10 7:03 ` [PATCH] sysfs/bin: Fix size handling overflow for bin_attribute Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-10 17:38 ` Greg KH
2013-10-10 17:40 ` Greg KH
2013-10-10 20:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-10 17:44 ` sysfs for my chips Greg KH
2013-10-10 20:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-10 20:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-10-10 21:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-11 6:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-10-11 9:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1381378788.4330.30.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox