The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
To: Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Huajun Li <huajun.li@intel.com>,
	Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Weihong Xu <weihong.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev 4/5] f2fs: Key functions to handle inline data
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:06:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383008787.14041.8.camel@kjgkr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+v9cxZfy37vzC+s8rDtpM34JLh38BBMocoU74TYRc1gvFSZPw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

2013-10-29 (화), 01:20 +0800, Huajun Li:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2013-10-26 (토), 00:01 +0800, Huajun Li:
> >> From: Huajun Li <huajun.li@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Functions to implement inline data read/write, and move inline data to
> >> normal data block when file size exceeds inline data limitation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Huajun Li <huajun.li@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Weihong Xu <weihong.xu@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/f2fs/Makefile |    2 +-
> >>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h   |    7 +++
> >>  fs/f2fs/inline.c |  144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  3 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 fs/f2fs/inline.c
> >>
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> +static int __f2fs_convert_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> >> +{
> >> +     int err;
> >> +     struct page *ipage;
> >> +     struct dnode_of_data dn;
> >> +     void *src_addr, *dst_addr;
> >> +     struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb);
> >> +
> >
> > Here..  f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
> >
> >> +     ipage = get_node_page(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> >> +     if (IS_ERR(ipage))
> >> +             return PTR_ERR(ipage);
> >> +
> >
> > Need to move f2fs_lock_op prior to get_node_page.
> >
> >> +     /* i_addr[0] is not used for inline data,
> >
> > Coding style.
> >          /*
> >           * ...
> >           */
> >
> >> +      * so reserving new block will not destroy inline data */
> >> +     err = f2fs_reserve_block(inode, &dn, 0);
> >> +     if (err) {
> >> +             f2fs_put_page(ipage, 1);
> >> +             f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> >> +             return err;
> >> +     }
> >
> > Need to move this too.
> >
> >> +
> >> +     src_addr = inline_data_addr(ipage);
> >> +     dst_addr = page_address(page);
> >> +     zero_user_segment(page, 0, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> >
> > + space for readability.
> >
> >> +     /* Copy the whole inline data block */
> >> +     memcpy(dst_addr, src_addr, MAX_INLINE_DATA);
> >> +     zero_user_segment(ipage, INLINE_DATA_OFFSET,
> >> +                              INLINE_DATA_OFFSET + MAX_INLINE_DATA);
> >> +     clear_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_INLINE_DATA);
> >> +     set_raw_inline(F2FS_I(inode),
> >> +                     (struct f2fs_inode *)page_address(ipage));
> 
> Thanks for your comments, I will update them according to above comments.
> 
> >
> >    --> sync_inode_page()?
> >
> IMO, we just handle file data, so do we still need call sync_inode_page() ?

I think sync_inode_page() is more suitable, since we need to sync
between i_size, i_blocks and its i_flag, inline_data, at this moment.

> 
> >> +
> >> +     set_page_dirty(ipage);

Need to consider skipping set_page_dirty(ipage).

> >> +     f2fs_put_page(ipage, 1);
> >> +     set_page_dirty(page);
> >
> > Here... f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> >
> > Here, we need to consider data consistency.
> > Let's think about the below scenario.
> > 1. inline_data was written.
> > 2. sync_fs is done.
> > 3. additional data were written.
> >   : this triggers f2fs_convert_inline_data(), produces a page, and then
> > unsets the inline flag.
> > 4. checkpoint was done with updated inode page. Note that, checkpoint
> > doesn't guarantee any user data.
> > 5. sudden power-off is occurred.
> >   -> Once power-off-recovery is done, we loose the inline_data which was
> > written successfully at step #2.
> >
> > So, I think we need to do f2fs_sync_file() procedure at this moment.
> > Any idea?
> >
> 
> Yes, need consider this case carefully, thanks for your reminder.
> 
> Considering sudden power-off may happen before f2fs_sync_file() is
> called, so how about following solutions:
>      ...
>      /* Copy the whole inline data block */
>      memcpy(dst_addr, src_addr, MAX_INLINE_DATA);
> 
>     do f2fs_sync_file() procedure ( Or  do write_data_page() procedure ? )

Ya, but it may still have some conditions to do this or not.
One of them is checking whether previous inline data should be recovered
or not, for example.

> 
>      zero_user_segment(ipage, INLINE_DATA_OFFSET, INLINE_DATA_OFFSET +
> MAX_INLINE_DATA);
>      clear_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_INLINE_DATA);
>      set_raw_inline(F2FS_I(inode), (struct f2fs_inode *)page_address(ipage));
>      ...
> 
> >> +
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int f2fs_convert_inline_data(struct inode *inode,
> >> +                          struct page *p, unsigned flags)
> >> +{
> >> +     int err;
> >> +     struct page *page;
> >> +
> >> +     if (p && !p->index) {
> >> +             page = p;
> >> +     } else {
> >> +             page = grab_cache_page_write_begin(inode->i_mapping, 0, flags);
> >> +             if (IS_ERR(page))
> >> +                     return PTR_ERR(page);
> >> +     }
> >> +
> >> +     err = __f2fs_convert_inline_data(inode, page);
> >> +
> >> +     if (p && !p->index)
> >> +             f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> >> +
> >> +     return err;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +int f2fs_write_inline_data(struct inode *inode,
> >> +                        struct page *page, unsigned size)
> >> +{
> >> +     void *src_addr, *dst_addr;
> >> +     struct page *ipage;
> >> +     struct dnode_of_data dn;
> >> +     int err;
> >> +
> >> +     set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> >> +     err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, 0, LOOKUP_NODE);
> >> +     if (err)
> >> +             return err;
> >> +     ipage = dn.inode_page;
> >> +
> >> +     src_addr = page_address(page);
> >> +     dst_addr = inline_data_addr(ipage);
> >> +
> >> +     zero_user_segment(ipage, INLINE_DATA_OFFSET,
> >> +                              INLINE_DATA_OFFSET + MAX_INLINE_DATA);
> >> +     memcpy(dst_addr, src_addr, size);
> >> +     if (!f2fs_has_inline_data(inode))
> >> +             set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_INLINE_DATA);
> >> +     set_raw_inline(F2FS_I(inode),
> >> +                     (struct f2fs_inode *)page_address(ipage));
> >> +     set_page_dirty(ipage);
> >> +
> >> +     if ((F2FS_I(inode)->i_xattr_nid && inode->i_blocks == 2) ||
> >> +             (!F2FS_I(inode)->i_xattr_nid && inode->i_blocks == 1)) {
> >> +             f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> >> +             return 0;
> >> +     }
> >> +
> >> +     /* Release the first data block if it is allocated */
> >> +     truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1);
> >> +     f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> >> +
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > --
> > Jaegeuk Kim
> > Samsung
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung


  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-29  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-25 16:01 [f2fs-dev 0/5] f2fs: Enable f2fs support inline data Huajun Li
2013-10-25 16:01 ` [f2fs-dev 1/5] f2fs: Add flags and helpers to " Huajun Li
2013-10-25 16:01 ` [f2fs-dev 2/5] f2fs: Add a new mount option: inline_data Huajun Li
2013-10-25 16:01 ` [f2fs-dev 3/5] f2fs: Add a new function: f2fs_reserve_block() Huajun Li
     [not found]   ` <1382962607.992.104.camel@kjgkr>
2013-10-28 12:28     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-10-28 16:53       ` Huajun Li
2013-10-29  0:56         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-10-29 15:27           ` Huajun Li
2013-10-25 16:01 ` [f2fs-dev 4/5] f2fs: Key functions to handle inline data Huajun Li
2013-10-28 12:43   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-10-28 17:20     ` Huajun Li
2013-10-29  1:06       ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2013-10-29 15:33         ` Huajun Li
2013-10-25 16:01 ` [f2fs-dev 5/5] f2fs: Handle inline data operations Huajun Li
2013-10-28 12:44   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-10-28 16:56     ` Huajun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1383008787.14041.8.camel@kjgkr \
    --to=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=huajun.li.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=huajun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weihong.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox