From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753950Ab3KANw3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:52:29 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:23727 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164Ab3KANw1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:52:27 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,535,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="402157052" From: Adrian Hunter To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Mike Galbraith , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Stephane Eranian Subject: [PATCH V3 09/11] perf test: Update "sample parsing" test for PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:51:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1383313899-15987-10-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.11.7 In-Reply-To: <1383313899-15987-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> References: <1383313899-15987-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In fact the "sample parsing" test does not automatically check new sample type bits - they must be added to the comparison logic. Doing that shows that the test fails because the functions perf_event__synthesize_sample() and perf_event__sample_event_size() have not been updated with PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION either. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter --- tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c index 61c9da2..1b67720 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c @@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1, if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC) COMP(data_src); + if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION) + COMP(transaction); + return true; } @@ -165,6 +168,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs_user, u64 read_format) .cpu = 110, .raw_size = sizeof(raw_data), .data_src = 111, + .transaction = 112, .raw_data = (void *)raw_data, .callchain = &callchain.callchain, .branch_stack = &branch_stack.branch_stack, @@ -273,7 +277,8 @@ int test__sample_parsing(void) /* * Fail the test if it has not been updated when new sample format bits - * were added. + * were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change + * the condition below. */ if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION << 1) { pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n"); -- 1.7.11.7