From: Ashley Lai <adlai@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/5 v2] tpm: Pull everything related to sysfs into tpm-sysfs.c
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:53:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384645999.7518.46.camel@fishsauce> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383536326-28772-3-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3bcfed0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Obsidian Reearch Corp
Typo Research?
> + * Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
> + *
> +#include "tpm.h"
> +
> +/* XXX for now this helper is duplicated in tpm.c */
I think you mean this is duplicated in tpm-interface.c. Is there a
reason why we cannot add this to tpm.h to avoid this duplication?
> +static ssize_t transmit_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip, struct tpm_cmd_t *cmd,
> + int len, const char *desc)
> +{
> +static ssize_t pubek_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
Most of the functions in this file are moved from tpm-interface.c
without any modification to the code. Why do we need to change the
function names in this file? Unless there is a good reason for it
otherwise I would prefer to keep the same function names. This is for
easy maintaining (for me at least :)) in case there are issues in the
future and we need to go back we can easily find out where they came
from.
Thanks,
--Ashley Lai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-16 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-04 3:38 tpm: Remainder of earlier clean up Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-04 3:38 ` [PATCH 1/5 v2] tpm: Pull everything related to /dev/tpmX into tpm-dev.c Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-16 22:18 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Ashley Lai
2013-11-17 0:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-04 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/5 v2] tpm: Pull everything related to sysfs into tpm-sysfs.c Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-16 23:53 ` Ashley Lai [this message]
2013-11-17 0:24 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-04 3:38 ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] tpm: Create a tpm_class_ops structure and use it in the drivers Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-17 0:57 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Ashley Lai
2013-11-04 3:38 ` [PATCH 4/5 v2] tpm: Use the ops structure instead of a copy in tpm_vendor_specific Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-17 1:09 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Ashley Lai
2013-11-04 3:38 ` [PATCH 5/5 v2] tpm: Make tpm-dev allocate a per-file structure Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-17 2:01 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Ashley Lai
2013-11-08 16:54 ` [tpmdd-devel] tpm: Remainder of earlier clean up Ashley Lai
2013-11-08 17:23 ` Aw: " Peter Huewe
2013-12-07 13:21 ` Peter Hüwe
2013-12-10 1:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1384645999.7518.46.camel@fishsauce \
--to=adlai@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox