From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: lee.jones@linaro.org
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mfd: wm5110: Add register patch for rev D chip
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:36:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384875366-2527-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
Evaluation of revision D of WM5110 suggests updates to the register
patch for optimal performance. For the sake of clarity rev C of the chip
does not require a register patch.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
Updated the commit message to give a little more info on
what the register patch is for.
As regards add #defines for the silicon revisions I am not
sure it adds a significant amount of extra clarity, is "case
A: case B:" really a lot clearer than "case 0: case 1:"
but that said I am happy to do a patch for this if we feel
strongly about it? Although I would suggest it should be
seperate from this patch.
Thanks,
Charles
drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c b/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
index daf2fe8..bd9c3c9 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm5110-tables.c
@@ -223,6 +223,31 @@ static const struct reg_default wm5110_revb_patch[] = {
{ 0x80, 0x0 },
};
+static const struct reg_default wm5110_revd_patch[] = {
+ { 0x80, 0x3 },
+ { 0x80, 0x3 },
+ { 0x393, 0x27 },
+ { 0x394, 0x27 },
+ { 0x395, 0x27 },
+ { 0x396, 0x27 },
+ { 0x397, 0x27 },
+ { 0x398, 0x26 },
+ { 0x221, 0x90 },
+ { 0x211, 0x8 },
+ { 0x36c, 0x1fb },
+ { 0x26e, 0x64 },
+ { 0x26f, 0xea },
+ { 0x270, 0x1f16 },
+ { 0x51b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x55b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x59b, 0x1 },
+ { 0x4f0, 0x633 },
+ { 0x441, 0xc059 },
+ { 0x209, 0x27 },
+ { 0x80, 0x0 },
+ { 0x80, 0x0 },
+};
+
/* We use a function so we can use ARRAY_SIZE() */
int wm5110_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
{
@@ -235,7 +260,10 @@ int wm5110_patch(struct arizona *arizona)
return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
wm5110_revb_patch,
ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revb_patch));
-
+ case 3:
+ return regmap_register_patch(arizona->regmap,
+ wm5110_revd_patch,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(wm5110_revd_patch));
default:
return 0;
}
--
1.7.2.5
reply other threads:[~2013-11-19 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1384875366-2527-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).