From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752692Ab3K0Oji (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:39:38 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:43812 "EHLO mail-pb0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750905Ab3K0Ojh (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:39:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] tracing/probes: Fix basic print type functions From: Namhyung Kim To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Steven Rostedt , Oleg Nesterov , Hyeoncheol Lee , Srikar Dronamraju , "zhangwei(Jovi)" , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Hemant Kumar , LKML , Namhyung Kim In-Reply-To: <5295DE36.4070508@hitachi.com> References: <1385533203-10014-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1385533203-10014-3-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <5295DE36.4070508@hitachi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:39:28 +0900 Message-ID: <1385563168.1685.36.camel@leonhard> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Masami, 2013-11-27 (수), 20:57 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu: > (2013/11/27 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8, "%x", unsigned int) > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%x", unsigned int) > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%lx", unsigned long) > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%llx", unsigned long long) > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s8, "%d", int) > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s16, "%d", int) > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s32, "%ld", long) > > -DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(s64, "%lld", long long) > > +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u8 , "%#x") > > +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u16, "%#x") > > +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u32, "%#x") > > +DEFINE_BASIC_PRINT_TYPE_FUNC(u64, "%#Lx") > > As I said I'd like to ask you to change it in %x. > > I just checked in Fedora18, but %#x is not supported on this glibc-2.17. > Since this format is exported via debugfs (format file), I think %x is > better. Hmm.. but in most cases it's used for printf() not scanf(), right? In that case adding 0x prefix will help human readers a lot. How about mandating the prefix with "0x%x"? This way it can be used both for printf() and scanf() IMHO. Thanks, Namhyung