public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:12:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387775559.5369.20.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387773533.5369.16.camel@marge.simpson.net>

On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 05:38 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> On Sun, 2013-12-22 at 09:57 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> > I'll let the box give
> > RCU something to do for a couple days.  No news is good news.
> 
> Ho ho hum, merry christmas, gift attached.
> 
> I'll beat on virgin -rt7, see if it survives, then re-apply RCU patch
> and retest.  This kernel had nohz_full enabled, along with Sebastian's
> pending -rt fix for same, so RCU patch was not only not running solo,
> box was running a known somewhat buggy config as well.  Box was doing
> endless tbench 64 when it started stalling fwiw.
> 
> -Mike

P.S.

virgin -rt7 doing tbench 64 + make -j64

[   97.907960] perf samples too long (3138 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
[  103.047921] perf samples too long (5544 > 5000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000
[  181.561271] perf samples too long (10318 > 10000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 13000
[  184.243750] INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to run: 1.084 msecs
[  248.914422] perf samples too long (19719 > 19230), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 7000
[  382.116674] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10
[  405.201593] perf samples too long (36824 > 35714), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 4000
[  444.704185] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.704208] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.704579] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.704678] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.705100] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.705980] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.705994] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.708315] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  444.710348] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
[  474.435582] INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to run: 1.096 msecs
[  475.994055] perf samples too long (63124 > 62500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 2000

Those annoying perf gripes are generic, not -rt.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-23  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-21 19:39 [PATCH] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-12-22  3:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-12-22  8:57   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-12-23  4:38     ` Mike Galbraith
2013-12-23  5:12       ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2014-01-24 19:46         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-01-25  5:20           ` Mike Galbraith
2013-12-24 19:36       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-25  3:07         ` Mike Galbraith
2013-12-25  7:55           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-25 17:37             ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-17 17:14               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-01-18  3:25                 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-24 19:50                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-01-25  5:12                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-27  5:10                       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-27 16:54                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-27 17:03                           ` Mike Galbraith
2013-12-26 10:03           ` Mike Galbraith
2014-01-17 17:23             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-01-18  3:30               ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1387775559.5369.20.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=bitbucket@online.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox