From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:29:09 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1388559142.60584.1460820549723.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160416130831.GA29917@lerouge>
----- On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Frederic Weisbecker fweisbec@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:52:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> Hello, Frederic,
>>
>> One thing that I have had on my list for some time is to rearrange the
>> RCU source code to make it easier to find things. Given our discussion
>> yesterday, this seemed like a good time to take that step with the
>> expedited grace-period code. I have a couple of commits doing this in
>> -rcu, and would like your opinion. Worthwhile, or should I revert those
>> two commits?
>
> It's definetly worth having a look! And it might help me eventually understand
> that expedited grace period thing :-)
Moving the expedited handling into its own files indeed
seems to better organize the sub-parts of RCU. That seems
like a good idea.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-16 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-15 23:52 Isolated expedited RCU code to a new tree_exp.h Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-16 13:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-16 15:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2016-04-17 2:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1388559142.60584.1460820549723.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox