From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751769AbaAGNAe (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 08:00:34 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.9]:64753 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751500AbaAGNAZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2014 08:00:25 -0500 Message-ID: <1389099622.15032.18.camel@x41> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] net/mlx4_core: clean up two functions From: Paul Bolle To: Or Gerlitz , Jack Morgenstein , Rony Efraim , Hadar Hen Zion , "David S. Miller" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:00:22 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 (3.10.3-1.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2014 13:00:23.0768 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D913D80:01CF0BA8] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 0) These two patches are very similar. They both clean up a function to help GCC understand the codeflow. Both help silence a warning. 1) Compile tested only (on 32 bits x86). I do not have this hardware. 2) Please note that there's no MAINTAINERS entry for mlx4_core. (Neither is there an entry for the MLX4 IB driver.) Shouldn't it be added? Paul Bolle (2): net/mlx4_core: clean up cq_res_start_move_to() net/mlx4_core: clean up srq_res_start_move_to() .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 96 ++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) -- 1.8.4.2