Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/triggers: A couple minor variable name changes

[Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 22:31 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:51:09 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'll run the next version through my 'testsuite', which unfortunately is
> > still manual (one of the many things on my todo list is automate it)..
> 
> I have some basic tests, attached is one. Which failed. Here's the
> patch that fixes it:
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> tracing: Fix counter for traceon/off event triggers
> 
> The counters for the traceon and traceoff are only suppose to decrement
> when the trigger enables or disables tracing. It is not suppose to decrement
> every time the event is hit.
> 
> Only decrement the counter if the trigger actually did something.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Acked-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> index f6dd115..a53e0da 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -742,13 +742,16 @@ traceon_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data)
>  static void
>  traceon_count_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data)
>  {
> +	if (tracing_is_on())
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (!data->count)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (data->count != -1)
>  		(data->count)--;
>  
> -	traceon_trigger(data);
> +	tracing_on();
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -763,13 +766,16 @@ traceoff_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data)
>  static void
>  traceoff_count_trigger(struct event_trigger_data *data)
>  {
> +	if (!tracing_is_on())
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (!data->count)
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (data->count != -1)
>  		(data->count)--;
>  
> -	traceoff_trigger(data);
> +	tracing_off();
>  }
>  
>  static int