public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
	JBottomley@parallels.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] kernfs: invoke kernfs_unmap_bin_file() directly from kernfs_deactivate()
Date: Tue,  7 Jan 2014 12:59:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389117590-25705-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389117590-25705-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

kernfs_unmap_bin_file() is supposed to unmap all memory mappings of
the target file before kernfs_remove() finishes; however, it currently
is being called from kernfs_addrm_finish() and has the same race
problem as the original implementation of deactivation when there are
multiple removers - only the remover which snatches the node to its
addrm_cxt->removed list is guaranteed to wait for its completion
before returning.

It can be easily fixed by moving kernfs_unmap_bin_file() invocation
from kernfs_addrm_finish() to kernfs_deactivated().  The function may
be called multiple times but that shouldn't do any harm.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 fs/kernfs/dir.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
index a73caa6..ff633d2 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
@@ -177,9 +177,10 @@ void kernfs_put_active(struct kernfs_node *kn)
  *	kernfs_deactivate - deactivate kernfs_node
  *	@kn: kernfs_node to deactivate
  *
- *	Deny new active references and drain existing ones.  Mutiple
- *	removers may invoke this function concurrently on @kn and all will
- *	return after deactivation and draining are complete.
+ *	Deny new active references, drain existing ones and nuke all
+ *	existing mmaps.  Mutiple removers may invoke this function
+ *	concurrently on @kn and all will return after deactivation and
+ *	draining are complete.
  */
 static void kernfs_deactivate(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	__releases(&kernfs_mutex) __acquires(&kernfs_mutex)
@@ -209,6 +210,8 @@ static void kernfs_deactivate(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	lock_acquired(&kn->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 	rwsem_release(&kn->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
 
+	kernfs_unmap_bin_file(kn);
+
 	mutex_lock(&kernfs_mutex);
 }
 
@@ -477,7 +480,6 @@ void kernfs_addrm_finish(struct kernfs_addrm_cxt *acxt)
 
 		acxt->removed = kn->u.removed_list;
 
-		kernfs_unmap_bin_file(kn);
 		kernfs_put(kn);
 	}
 }
-- 
1.8.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-07 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-07 17:59 [PATCHSET driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 01/12] kernfs: fix get_active failure handling in kernfs_seq_*() Tejun Heo
2014-01-10 13:48   ` Sasha Levin
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 02/12] kernfs: replace kernfs_node->u.completion with kernfs_root->deactivate_waitq Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 03/12] kernfs: restructure removal path to fix possible premature return Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 05/12] kernfs: remove kernfs_addrm_cxt Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 06/12] kernfs: remove KERNFS_ACTIVE_REF and add kernfs_lockdep() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 07/12] kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 08/12] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement kernfs_remove_self() and its wrappers Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 18:36   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 09/12] pci: use device_remove_file_self() instead of device_schedule_callback() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 10/12] scsi: " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 11/12] s390: " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 12/12] remove-unused-callback-mechanism Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 18:04   ` [PATCH REPOST 12/12] sysfs, driver-core: remove unused {sysfs|device}_schedule_callback_owner() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 21:41 ` [PATCHSET driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal Tejun Heo
2014-01-08  1:01   ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-03 19:02 [PATCHSET v5 " Tejun Heo
2014-02-03 19:02 ` [PATCH 04/12] kernfs: invoke kernfs_unmap_bin_file() directly from kernfs_deactivate() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1389117590-25705-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox