From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>,
"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 12/18] clk: versatile: Split config options for sp810 and vexpress_osc
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:06:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389197175.23721.24.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131223200538.25490.67340@quantum>
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 20:05 +0000, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Pawel Moll (2013-12-23 08:23:44)
> > Move the Kconfig entry for Versatile (& Express) clock drivers
> > into a separate file and add individual options for sp810
> > and vexpress_osc drivers, as they are optional in some
> > configurations and may have separate dependencies.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
>
> Is there a reason to continue to expose these as user-visible config
> options? I guess that with Device Tree we can just include clock nodes
> (or not) for boards that use these clocks (or do not use them).
>
> And it seems for many configurations COMMON_CLK_VERSATILE is always
> selected, so what is the point of the other two sub-options?
It's mostly for arm64, where all the bits and pieces are individually
selected (and SP810 is not present in some vexpress configurations).
Paweł
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-23 16:23 [RFC 00/18] Versatile Express config rework Pawel Moll
[not found] ` < 1387815830-8794-7-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com>
[not found] ` < 1387815830-8794-5-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com>
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 01/18] mfd: syscon: Consider platform data a regmap config name Pawel Moll
2014-01-06 9:48 ` Lee Jones
2014-01-06 10:20 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 02/18] power/reset: vexpress: Use sched_clock as the time source Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 19:28 ` John Stultz
2014-01-08 16:01 ` Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 03/18] GPIO: gpio-generic: Add label to platform data Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 17:26 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-08 15:57 ` Pawel Moll
2014-01-14 10:30 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-14 10:44 ` Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 04/18] driver core & of: Mark of_nodes of added device as populated Pawel Moll
2014-01-08 17:28 ` Rob Herring
2014-01-16 17:03 ` Grant Likely
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 05/18] driver core: Do not WARN when devres list is not empty at probe time Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 06/18] regmap: Formalise use of non-bus context Pawel Moll
2013-12-24 12:45 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-09 13:08 ` Pawel Moll
2014-01-09 13:34 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-09 15:47 ` Pawel Moll
2014-01-16 17:09 ` Grant Likely
2014-01-16 17:20 ` Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 07/18] regmap: debugfs: Always create "registers" & "access" files Pawel Moll
2013-12-24 12:19 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-08 17:31 ` Pawel Moll
2014-01-08 18:00 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 08/18] hwmon: vexpress: Use regmap instead of custom interface Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 17:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-08 15:57 ` Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 09/18] power/reset: " Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 10/18] regulator: " Pawel Moll
2013-12-24 12:24 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-08 18:25 ` Pawel Moll
2014-01-09 13:35 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 11/18] clocksource: Sched clock source for Versatile Express Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 12/18] clk: versatile: Split config options for sp810 and vexpress_osc Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 20:05 ` Mike Turquette
2014-01-08 16:06 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 13/18] clk: versatile: Use regmap instead of custom interface Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 14/18] ARM: vexpress: remove redundant vexpress_dt_cpus_num to get cpu count Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 15/18] ARM: vexpress: Simplify SMP operations for DT-powered system Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 16/18] bus: Versatile Express configuration bus Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 17/18] misc: Versatile Express System Config interface driver Pawel Moll
2013-12-23 16:23 ` [RFC 18/18] mfd: vexpress: Split sysreg functions into MFD cells Pawel Moll
2014-01-06 10:40 ` Lee Jones
2014-01-08 16:17 ` Pawel Moll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389197175.23721.24.camel@hornet \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tixy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox