public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: OMAP: clock DT conversion issues with omap36xx
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:21:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1390994505.5023.32.camel@mars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390928565.4904.88.camel@mars>

On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 18:02 +0100, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 15:40 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > 
> > >> Due to a regression since next-20140122 the following errors are present:
> > >>
> > >>   - pin sys_clkout2, which gets configured to 24 Mhz by the fourth patch
> > >>     in this set, erroneously outputs only 12 Mhz.
> > >>     Just out of curiosity, configuring it to 48 Mhz puts out desired 24 Mhz.
> > >>
> > >>   - omap_dss, which gets configured by the third patch in this set, fails
> > >>     to do 'dss_set_fck_rate(fck);' in
> > >>     drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c:dss_setup_default_clock() which leads to:
> > >>
> > >>      | omapdss_dss: probe of omapdss_dss failed with error -22
> > >>      | omapdss CORE error: Failed to initialize DSS platform driver
> > >>      | panel-dpi panel-dpi.0: failed to find video source 'dpi.0
> > >>
> > >>    Both regressions seem to have something to do with the clock framework.
> > >>    Could this be related to the DT clock conversion patches?
> > >
> > 
> > Yea its definitely possible, as the clock DT conversion touches pretty 
> > much everything. Have you tried whether this works properly with legacy 
> > boot? Personally I don't have access to any omap3 devices that would 
> > have display and have no possibility to check this out myself. Anyway, 
> > my initial guess is that some clock divider setup might be wrong with 
> > omap3, or we are missing some ti,set-rate-parent flag for some clock 
> > node which prevents escalating clk_set_rate properly. However, it should 
> > be easy to debug this by looking at the clock node in question, and its 
> > parent nodes to see if there are any problems.
> 
> Currently I only analyzed sys_clkout2 (see attachments for full
> clk_summary files):
> 
> clk_summary__next-20140115__works_as_expected:
>              dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
>                 dpll4_m2x2_ck   1           1            96000000
>                    omap_192m_alwon_fck 1           1            96000000
>                       omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            96000000
>                          per_96m_fck 0           6            96000000
>                             mcbsp4_fck 0           1            96000000
>                             mcbsp3_fck 0           2            96000000
>                             mcbsp2_fck 0           2            96000000
>                          cm_96m_fck 2           3            96000000
>                             clkout2_src_ck 1           1            96000000
>                                sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000
> 
> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are correctly 24 Mhz measured.
> 
> clk_summary__next-20140124__sysclkout2_dss_fails:
>              dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
>                 dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1           1            192000000
>                    dpll4_m2x2_ck 1           1            192000000
>                       omap_192m_alwon_fck 0           0            192000000
>                       omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            192000000
>                          per_96m_fck 0           6            192000000
>                             mcbsp4_fck 0           1            192000000
>                             mcbsp3_fck 0           2            192000000
>                             mcbsp2_fck 0           2            192000000
>                          cm_96m_fck 2           3            192000000
>                             clkout2_src_ck 1           1            192000000
>                                sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000
> 
> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are only ~12 Mhz measured.
> 
> So I added this patch:
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: fix omap3 clock multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck
> 
> Before DT clock conversion, there was no multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck.
> So to be compatible again, set dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck multiplier back to 1.
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> index cb04d4b..b594050 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
>  		#clock-cells = <0>;
>  		compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
>  		clocks = <&dpll4_m2_ck>;
> -		clock-mult = <2>;
> +		clock-mult = <1>;
>  		clock-div = <1>;
>  	};
>
> And it works again. But due to the fact that sys_clkout2 was at 12 Mhz
> instead of 24, shouldn't it have been at 48 caused by "clock-mult = 2 ?

Any ideas on that?

I reverted the patch above and added:

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:03:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap36xx: fix omap96m_alwon_fck

OMAP36xx has different hardware implementation for the omap96m_alwon_fck
compared to other OMAP3 variants. Reflect this properly in the dts file.

Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi |    9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
index 2fcf253..24ddf3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -88,3 +88,12 @@
  			 <&mcbsp4_ick>, <&uart4_fck>;
  	};
  };
+
+&omap_96m_alwon_fck {
+	compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+	clocks = <&omap_192m_alwon_fck>;
+	ti,bit-shift = <12>;
+	ti,max-div = <2>;
+	reg = <0x0a40>;
+	ti,index-starts-at-one;
+};

But the output of sys_clkout2 is still wrong.

clk_summary__next-20140124__patch_tero_fix_omap96m_alwon_fck
             dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
                dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1           1            192000000
                   dpll4_m2x2_ck 1           1            192000000
                      omap_192m_alwon_fck 1           1            192000000
                         omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            192000000
                            per_96m_fck 0           6            192000000
                               mcbsp4_fck 0           1            192000000
                               mcbsp3_fck 0           2            192000000
                               mcbsp2_fck 0           2            192000000
                            cm_96m_fck 2           3            192000000
                               clkout2_src_ck 1           1            192000000
                                  sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000

Thanks
  -- Christoph


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-29 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-27 17:30 [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-27 18:41 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-28  9:04   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  9:35     ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-28  9:48       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28 13:40         ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-28 17:02           ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-29 11:21             ` Christoph Fritz [this message]
2014-01-29 14:57               ` OMAP: clock DT conversion issues with omap36xx Tero Kristo
2014-02-01 18:55                 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-29 19:03               ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-01 18:52                 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-02 20:09                   ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-04 15:50               ` Tero Kristo
2014-02-07 10:12                 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-07 13:49                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-10 20:54                     ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-11 14:53                       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-12 13:18                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-12 22:30                     ` Belisko Marek
2014-02-13  9:03                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-13 10:05                       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-14  2:18                         ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-28  7:50 ` [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  8:48   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28 18:17     ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-29  9:10       ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-29  9:29         ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-29  9:38           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-29  9:50             ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-29 11:30       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-29 18:52         ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-30  6:04           ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1390994505.5023.32.camel@mars \
    --to=chf.fritz@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox