Re: [PATCH] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 09:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:

> > From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > There are 7 architecures with "config SECCOMP".  They all have
> > virtually the same help text except for those referencing the
> > /proc interface.  The /proc interface was removed in 2007.
> > 
> > There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
> > that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
> > other syscall.  It is absurd to have the option in the
> > arch-specific menus.
> > 
> > Move it to the security menu, consolidate the 7 down to one, and
> > remove the embarassingly-ancient help text references and
> > dependencies on /proc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> > Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> 

For powerpc:

Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>