Re: [PATCH 24/28] Remove DEPRECATED

Randy Dunlap
2014-02-10T03:57:49Z

On 02/09/2014 07:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 02/09/2014 07:07 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>> On Sunday 09 February 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>>>> Feel free to open a new thread, with the relevant details, and
>>>>> involve the relevant people and lists. I have no idea what you're
>>>>> going on about and could not care less (in the context of this
>>>>> thread).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Bolle
>>>>
>>>> Been tried, got zero response. Frankly, posting just to lkml, hoping
>>>> the revalent people see it, is beginning to act like posting to a
>>>> black hole.
>>>>
>>> I saw one response to you, from Randy Dunlap, asking for more
>>>
>>> information : https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/8/153
>>
>> wow, I don't know how I saw this message (thanks, Ken),
>> but replying to this patch was NOT the right thing to do, Gene.
>>
>> Just reply to my request and I'll be glad to look into it.
>>
>>> After your posts a few days ago, I'm tempted to suggest you check
>>>
>>> your spam filters, and also any mail files your virus scanner might
>>> have quarantined. But it is also possible that you just haven't
>>> received it - email is like that.
>>>
>>> ؤ¸en
>
> Spam and viri filters watched carefully. I also use mailfilter, and watch
> its logs full time for FP's.

Still -- this ATSC problem should not be part of a reply to the Remove DEPRECATED patch.

> And I didn't reply because the question seemed way too broad, almost as if

what question seemed to broad?

> my lament wasn't read. That and the mail server doesn't like big

what mail server? yours? wdtv? vger.kernel.org certainly has no problem with them.

> attachments. So rather than reply to the list, I'll excise some of the
> addresses that bounce from a reply_all or don't like me, and send the
> .config from a 3.019 build which seems ok, but by the time that config is
> run thru a make oldconfig at 3.8.2, most all the media, ATSC and DVB stuff
> is gone. So I'll attach that one too. The later file grew 22kb, but
> wholesale parts of the first one are missing from the 2nd.

Gene, I want to make sure where you are saying the problem is.
Is it going directly from 3.019 to 3.8.2, with no intervening kernel versions?

I don't know what kernel version 3.019 is. Do you mean 3.0.19?
or is that some distro numbering?

>
> I've look at Makefile, but most Makefiles are swahili to me so I could be
> looking at it and not recognizing it.
>
> Thank you all.
>
> Cheers, Gene
>

--
~Randy