From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin: bf537: use "CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X"
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:22:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392286975.30853.44.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365153646.1830.58.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
[Replaced previous maintainer and list with current maintainer and
list.]
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 11:20 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Commit 57084ede395bb3c9da7905701d34a3b7d33c9356 ("blackfin: bf537:
> stamp: update board file for 193x") changed two references to
> CONFIG_SND_BF5XX_SOC_AD193X (and CONFIG_SND_BF5XX_SOC_AD193X_MODULE).
> One was changed to CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X_SPI, the other to
> CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X_I2C. The commit explanation doesn't elaborate on
> the reason for these changes nor on the reason to drop module support.
>
> Anyhow, neither of these two new Kconfig macros is valid. It was
> probably intended to use CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X here. So let's use that.
> And let's also reenable module support by using the IS_ENABLED() macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
And this issue is also still present in v3.14-rc2. Jean and Guenter
replied, but preferred not to get involved with this messy "stamp" file.
Can someone please actually look at this patch?
> 0) Untested. Please note that I fail to see the point of commit
> 57084ede395bb3c9da7905701d34a3b7d33c9356, which was added in v3.4, even
> if I assume it wanted to use CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X. Perhaps I'm missing
> something obvious. Anyhow, review is appreciated.
>
> 1) Added Jean and Guenter because they seem to take in interest in
> Blackfin's stamp files.
>
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c
> index e6fdc2a..94a193e 100644
> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c
> @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static struct spi_board_info bfin_spi_board_info[] __initdata = {
> },
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X_SPI
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X)
> {
> .modalias = "ad193x",
> .max_speed_hz = 3125000, /* max spi clock (SCK) speed in HZ */
> @@ -2176,7 +2176,7 @@ static unsigned long adt7316_i2c_data[2] = {
> #endif
>
> static struct i2c_board_info __initdata bfin_i2c_board_info[] = {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X_I2C
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X)
> {
> I2C_BOARD_INFO("ad1937", 0x04),
> },
Paul Bolle
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 9:20 [PATCH] Blackfin: bf537: use "CONFIG_SND_SOC_AD193X" Paul Bolle
2013-04-05 9:43 ` Jean Delvare
2013-04-05 14:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-02-13 10:22 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392286975.30853.44.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=realmz6@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox