From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] xen: remove XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:07:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392728861.5144.10.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392718467.30073.12.camel@x220>
This patch removes the Kconfig symbol XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST which is
used nowhere in the tree.
We do know grub2 has a script that greps kernel configuration files for
its macro. It shouldn't do that. As Linus summarized:
This is a grub bug. It really is that simple. Treat it as one.
Besides, grub2's grepping for that macro is actually superfluous. See,
that script currently contains this test (simplified):
grep -x CONFIG_XEN_DOM0=y $config || grep -x CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST=y $config
But since XEN_DOM0 and XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST are by definition equal,
removing XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST cannot influence this test.
So there's no reason to not remove this symbol, like we do with all
unused Kconfig symbols.
[pebolle@tiscali.nl: rewrote commit explanation.]
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
---
v2: added a few lines to the commit explanation to show grub2's test for
this symbol is superfluous anyway. Still only git "grep tested".
arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
index 01b9026..512219d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
@@ -19,11 +19,6 @@ config XEN_DOM0
depends on XEN && PCI_XEN && SWIOTLB_XEN
depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_IO_APIC && ACPI && PCI
-# Dummy symbol since people have come to rely on the PRIVILEGED_GUEST
-# name in tools.
-config XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
- def_bool XEN_DOM0
-
config XEN_PVHVM
def_bool y
depends on XEN && PCI && X86_LOCAL_APIC
--
1.8.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-18 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 12:23 [PATCH] xen: remove XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-17 13:03 ` Paul Bolle
2014-02-17 14:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-18 10:14 ` Paul Bolle
2014-02-18 13:07 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-02-18 13:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Bolle
2014-02-24 18:51 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-02-24 18:39 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-24 19:38 ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2014-02-28 20:54 ` Paul Bolle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392728861.5144.10.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox