From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/fb: mark ramfuc_reg() noinline
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:10:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394197805.13615.5.camel@x41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389350275.2528.10.camel@x41>
Paul Bolle schreef op vr 10-01-2014 om 11:37 [+0100]:
> Building ramnve0.o triggers a GCC warning on 32 bits x86:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c: In function 'nve0_ram_ctor':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnve0.c:1253:1: warning: the frame size of 1496 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> This warning is caused by ramfuc_reg(), which is inlined 74 times in
> nve0_ram_ctor(). Mark it noinline to silence this warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> Compile tested (on 32 bits x86) only. I've no Nvidia cards at hand, so I
> can't really test it.
>
> This assumes this function - a constructor, apparently - isn't called
Here "this function" refers to nve0_ram_ctor().
> often, so the overhead calling of 74 functions is acceptable. (The same
> goes for the similar functions in [...]/ramnva3.c and in
> [...]/ramnvc0.c, though these call ramfuc_reg() not quite as often.)
> Perhaps there are other downsides to not inlining this function too. So
And here it refers to ramfuc_reg(). So my writing was a bit confusing.
> proper testing will probably be needed.
Building v3.14-rc5 on 32 bit x86 still triggers this warning. Has anyone
tried to review or test this patch?
Paul Bolle
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h
> index 0f57fcf..04e3849 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ramfuc_reg2(u32 addr1, u32 addr2)
> };
> }
>
> -static inline struct ramfuc_reg
> +static noinline struct ramfuc_reg
> ramfuc_reg(u32 addr)
> {
> return ramfuc_reg2(addr, addr);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 10:37 [PATCH] drm/nouveau/fb: mark ramfuc_reg() noinline Paul Bolle
2014-03-07 13:10 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394197805.13615.5.camel@x41 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox