From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753235AbaCMD5E (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:57:04 -0400
Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:41348 "EHLO
	smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753127AbaCMD4s (ORCPT
	<rfc822;groupwise-linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org:0:0>);
	Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:56:48 -0400
Subject: Re: [RESEND] Fast TSC calibration fails with v3.14-rc1 and later
From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Julian Wollrath <jwollrath@web.de>, x86@kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <532121D2.40805@zytor.com>
References: <20140310110410.5b2218f6@ilfaris>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403121722030.18573@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403121729060.18573@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
	 <1554867.utJVyPuT6A@vostro.rjw.lan>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403130049500.18573@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
	 <1394678307.26565.218.camel@linux-s257.site>  <532121D2.40805@zytor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:55:54 +0800
Message-ID: <1394682954.26565.228.camel@linux-s257.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

於 三，2014-03-12 於 20:11 -0700，H. Peter Anvin 提到：
> On 03/12/2014 07:38 PM, joeyli wrote:
> > 
> > I sent rtc-acpitad driver for RTC subsystem on last month, I will send
> > second version.
> > 
> > For using TAD to set wall clock is because in ACPI 5.0 spec, there have
> > a "CMOS RTC Not Present" flag in FADT to indicate OSPM should use TAD
> > when this flag set:
> > 
> > CMOS RTC Not Present
> > 
> 
> Bullsh*t.  The TAD should be used if it is present, it has nothing to do
> with this flag.
> 
> 	-hpa
> 
> 

So do not care "CMOS RTC Not Present", if TAD is present then we use it
instead of CMOS RTC in all kernel code? or we still can use CMOS RTC?


Regards
Joey Lee