From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] nohz: Move nohz kick out of scheduler IPI
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:28:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1395253702-12489-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
When a full dynticks CPU runs in single task mode then a new task gets
enqueued, we notify it through an IPI such that it restarts its tick.
The IPI used here is the scheduler IPI. There are a few reasons for that:
it can be called when interrupts are disabled, it can be called
concurrently... These properties altogether aren't offered by the IPI
subsystem.
Meanwhile, bloating that way the scheduler IPI with scheduler unrelated
code is an abuse of this fast path. We certainly don't want to start a
big kernel IPI (BKI, the new shiny piece of my collection of big kernel
things aside the big kernel tick, the big reiserfs lock, ..).
So this patchset adds a small helper to the IPI subsystem that allows
to queue an IPI from interrupt disabled code and handles concurrent
callers as well. Eventually the nohz kick gets converted to this new facility.
Partly inspired by a suggestion from Peter Zijlstra.
Comments?
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
nohz/ipi
Thanks,
Frederic
---
Frederic Weisbecker (3):
smp: Non busy-waiting IPI queue
nohz: Move full nohz kick to its own IPI
nohz: Use IPI implicit full barrier against rq->nr_running r/w
include/linux/smp.h | 12 ++++++++++++
include/linux/tick.h | 2 ++
kernel/sched/core.c | 14 ++++++--------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 12 +++++++++---
kernel/smp.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-19 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-19 18:28 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-03-19 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] smp: Non busy-waiting IPI queue Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-19 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] nohz: Move full nohz kick to its own IPI Frederic Weisbecker
2014-03-19 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] nohz: Use IPI implicit full barrier against rq->nr_running r/w Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1395253702-12489-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox