From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Michael Fyles <mf@vorston.net>
Cc: "Prasad J. Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] initramfs: remove "compression mode" choice
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:03:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397217807.13525.21.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140411112611.GA508@dev0.mafconsulting.com>
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 12:26 +0100, Michael Fyles wrote:
> Whilst I agree (for my use-cases) with INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION and
> RD being merged, I think it has happened the wrong way round.
>
> Commit 9ba4bcb64589 mistakenly forced the logic in usr/Makefile
> to prioritise the selection of RD options such that selecting
> more than one supported compression pretty much rail-roads you
> into having your initrd compressed with gzip. This happends
> because because suffix-y gets updated once for each supported
> compression and, by default (on x86, at least) all compressions
> are supported.
>
> I think that either:
> 1. the options should be merged (with whatever name gets chosen)
> and pick both the run-time supported and the build-time
> compressions
> 2. both options should remain, with one choosing the supported
> run-time compressions and the other choosing the build-time
> compression
>
> If 1 is chosen, it would be advantageous to have RD as a
> mutually-exclusive choice -- this would be the place to put all
> the help texts that your patch removes.
>
> I currently have a patch that performs 2, if you decide that
> might be better.
This patch is a straightforward cleanup. It can't possibly change
anything for anyone.
My local .config tracks what Fedora uses for their kernel builds. I
don't think Fedora ever set one of the INITRAMFS_COMPRESSION_* options.
I didn't even knew these options became unused before grepping tree for
something entirely different.
But, of course, it's possible that 9ba4bcb64589 ("initramfs: read
CONFIG_RD_ variables for initramfs compression") broke stuff. If so,
that should probably be fixed. But you're likely better off discussing
that with Prasad (added as Cc).
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-08 12:07 [PATCH] initramfs: remove "compression mode" choice Paul Bolle
2014-04-08 13:29 ` P J P
2014-04-08 14:32 ` Paul Bolle
2014-04-08 14:46 ` P J P
2014-04-11 11:26 ` Michael Fyles
2014-04-11 12:03 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-04-11 12:55 ` P J P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397217807.13525.21.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mf@vorston.net \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox