From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Remove duplicated device type from sec_pmic
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:54:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397807684.29800.8.camel@AMDC1943> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140417082628.GG28725@lee--X1>
On czw, 2014-04-17 at 09:26 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > The device type was stored in sec_pmic state container twice:
> > - unsigned long type
> > - int device_type
>
> Can you explain that one of them is in the main container and the
> other is stored in pdata, which in turn is located in the main
> container, as this implies that both of them are located in the same
> place, which is not quite true.
Sure, I'll expand this section. However they were both stored in the
same place - struct sec_pmic. Additionally device_type is stored in
pdata.
>
> > The 'type' field was never used outside of probe so it can be safely
> > removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 5 +++--
> > include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > index d4682c6cbff5..fccfd71f8abd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> > @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> > struct sec_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&i2c->dev);
> > const struct regmap_config *regmap;
> > struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic;
> > + unsigned long device_type;
> > int ret;
> >
> > sec_pmic = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(struct sec_pmic_dev),
> > @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> > sec_pmic->dev = &i2c->dev;
> > sec_pmic->i2c = i2c;
> > sec_pmic->irq = i2c->irq;
> > - sec_pmic->type = sec_i2c_get_driver_data(i2c, id);
> > + device_type = sec_i2c_get_driver_data(i2c, id);
>
> Better to change the return type of 'sec_i2c_get_driver_data()' than
> to rely on a cast later on.
Hmmm... it was like that before Pankaj Dubey change (8f695de515b9).
Solving that issue (-Wpointer-to-int-cast) along with keeping 'int' as
return type of sec_i2c_get_driver_data would lead to one of:
1. Using temporary variable in ec_i2c_get_driver_data just for cast.
static inline int sec_i2c_get_driver_data(struct i2c_client *i2c,
const struct i2c_device_id *id)
{
unsigned long type;
if (i2c->dev.of_node) {
const struct of_device_id *match;
match = of_match_node(sec_dt_match, i2c->dev.of_node);
type = (unsigned long)match->data;
}
type = id->driver_data;
return (int)type;
}
or
2. Double cast: (int)(unsigned long)match->data;
For me both are kind a ugly... What do you think?
>
> > if (sec_pmic->dev->of_node) {
> > pdata = sec_pmic_i2c_parse_dt_pdata(sec_pmic->dev);
> > @@ -270,7 +271,7 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> > ret = PTR_ERR(pdata);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > - pdata->device_type = sec_pmic->type;
> > + pdata->device_type = (int)device_type;
> > }
> > if (pdata) {
> > sec_pmic->device_type = pdata->device_type;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> > index 84aaf6c25794..2633083262ea 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h
> > @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ struct sec_pmic_dev {
> > struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
> >
> > int ono;
> > - unsigned long type;
> > bool wakeup;
> > bool wtsr_smpl;
> > };
> > --
> > 1.8.3.2
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-18 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 12:03 [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Remove duplicated device type from sec_pmic Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-14 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: sec-core: Update sec_pmic documentation Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-17 8:32 ` Lee Jones
2014-04-18 7:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2014-04-17 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Remove duplicated device type from sec_pmic Lee Jones
2014-04-18 7:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2014-04-22 8:09 ` Lee Jones
2014-04-22 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397807684.29800.8.camel@AMDC1943 \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sbkim73@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox