From: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, ak@linux.intel.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Distirbute the clear operation of mces_seen to Per-CPU rather than only monarch CPU
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:03:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400637782.14703.32.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537C040E.3040901@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:40 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> (2014/05/20 11:11), Chen Yucong wrote:
> > mces_seen is a Per-CPU variable which should only be accessed by Per-CPU as possible. So the
> > clear operation of mces_seen should also be lcoal to Per-CPU rather than monarch CPU.
>
> I don't think it should be local.
> Originally what we want to have here is memory to save mces_seen for each online cpus,
> such as a global array like mces_seen[cpus]. But at same time we don't want to preallocate
> big array enough for max possible cpus. So we use per-cpu store instead.
>
But mces_seen will just be updated by Per-CPU rather than monarch CPU.
It is only read by monarch CPU.
> >
> > Meanwhile, there is also a potential risk that mces_seen will not be be cleared if a timeout
> > occors in mce_end for monarch CPU. As a reuslt, the stale value of mces_seen will reappear
> > on the next mce.
>
> In case if we decide panic in mce path, uncleared mces_seen can be referred from memory dump.
> I suppose it will help trouble investigation.
>
> >
> > Based on the above reasons, this patch distirbute the clear operation of mces_seen to Per-CPU
> > rather than only monarch CPU.
>
> "local" "occurs" "result" "distribute"
> I recommend you to use spell-checker for your postings...
Thanks very much for your suggestion, I will use a spell-cheker for my
carelessness.
thx!
cyc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-21 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-20 2:11 [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Distirbute the clear operation of mces_seen to Per-CPU rather than only monarch CPU Chen Yucong
2014-05-20 17:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-21 0:48 ` Chen Yucong
2014-05-21 1:33 ` Chen Yucong
2014-05-21 1:40 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2014-05-21 2:03 ` Chen Yucong [this message]
2014-05-21 2:43 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2014-05-21 3:19 ` Chen Yucong
2014-05-21 3:36 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2014-05-21 21:09 ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-23 1:32 ` Chen Yucong
2014-05-23 9:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-05-23 11:57 ` Chen Yucong
2014-05-23 22:40 ` Tony Luck
2014-05-23 21:50 ` Tony Luck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400637782.14703.32.camel@debian \
--to=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox