From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752095AbaEVRXM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 13:23:12 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:27161 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751039AbaEVRXK (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 13:23:10 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,888,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="545048277" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Shrinkers and proportional reclaim From: Tim Chen To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , Dave Chinner , Yuanhan Liu , Bob Liu , Jan Kara , Rik van Riel , Linux Kernel , Linux-MM , Linux-FSDevel In-Reply-To: <1400749779-24879-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> References: <1400749779-24879-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:22:42 -0700 Message-ID: <1400779362.2970.322.camel@schen9-DESK> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 10:09 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > This series is aimed at regressions noticed during reclaim activity. The > first two patches are shrinker patches that were posted ages ago but never > merged for reasons that are unclear to me. I'm posting them again to see if > there was a reason they were dropped or if they just got lost. Dave? Time? As far as I remembered, I think Dave was planning to merge this as part of his VFS scalability patch series. Otherwise there wasn't any other issues. Thanks to Mel for looking at these patches and Yunhan for testing them. Tim