From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752786AbaEWJH6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 05:07:58 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7]:50892 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751092AbaEWJH4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 05:07:56 -0400 Message-ID: <1400836074.31526.14.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] ARM: remove last use of CONFIG_CPU_ARM710 From: Paul Bolle To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:07:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4305975.PvMXZQ020k@wuerfel> References: <1364507176.1345.45.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <8309592.drxAj71PnZ@wuerfel> <1400059550.31197.12.camel@x220> <4305975.PvMXZQ020k@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-2.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 May 2014 09:07:55.0338 (UTC) FILETIME=[7BD5BAA0:01CF7666] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 14 May 2014 11:25:50 Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > 'git grep -i arm710' tells me that there is also some arm710 > > > specific code in arch/arm/mm/proc-arm720.S that we may want to > > > remove along with this. > > > > > > The DT binding should probably remain untouched though, I think it's > > > correct to document the string. > > > > That seems to be cpu_arm710_name, __arm710_setup, and everything called > > by __arm710_setup. Cleaning that up (as a separate patch) appears to be > > trivial. If I do that it would be (sort of educated) guesswork. But I > > don't mind doing it. What do you prefer? > > I think that would be great. For the first patch, please add > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Once the second patch is reviewed, please add them both to Russell's > patch tracker. Well, at least that second patch triggered a nice conversation. So I should now add the first patch (with your ACK) to the tracker? Paul Bolle