From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754954AbaE1QJr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 28 May 2014 12:09:47 -0400
Received: from cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.5]:62916 "EHLO
	cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754937AbaE1QJp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 28 May 2014 12:09:45 -0400
Message-ID: <1401293383.22486.18.camel@x220>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel_pwm: only build for supported platforms
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 18:09:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20140528155916.GA9793@piout.net>
References: <1399560433-1402630-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
	 <1399560990-1402858-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
	 <1399560990-1402858-17-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
	 <536CA80A.60201@atmel.com> <1401279867.22486.6.camel@x220>
	 <20140528155916.GA9793@piout.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-2.fc20) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 May 2014 16:09:44.0340 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D3DB540:01CF7A8F]
X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 17:59 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 28/05/2014 at 14:24:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote :
> > > >  config ATMEL_PWM
> > > >  	tristate "Atmel AT32/AT91 PWM support"
> > > > -	depends on HAVE_CLK && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)
> > > > +	depends on HAVE_CLK
> > > > +	depends on AVR32 || AT91SAM9263 || AT91SAM9RL || AT91SAM9G45
> > 
> > Symbols AT91SAM9263, AT91SAM9RL, and AT91SAM9G45 do not seem to exist in
> > next-20140528. Should these perhaps be SOC_AT91SAM9263, SOC_AT91SAM9RL,
> > and SOC_AT91SAM9G45 and/or ARCH_AT91SAM9263, ARCH_AT91SAM9RL, and
> > ARCH_AT91SAM9G45?
> 
> I wouldn't bother too much fixing that, this will definitely be remove
> in 3.17. 

Are you talking about: 1) the problem this patch tried to fix; or 2) the
problem it created?

> I was too late for 3.16 because my series was waiting on
> another patch set.

We're already too late to fix stuff for v3.16-rc1 (which will probably
only be released about three to four weeks from now)? Is that correct?


Paul Bolle