From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, waiman.long@hp.com,
jejb@parisc-linux.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave.anglin@bell.net, aswin@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:13:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402074788.6680.50.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402070140-15090-2-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com>
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 08:55 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Just like with mutexes (CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER),
> encapsulate the dependencies for rwsem optimistic spinning.
> No logical changes here as it continues to depend on both
> SMP and the XADD algorithm variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
> ---
> include/linux/rwsem.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/Kconfig.locks | 4 ++++
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Do we also want to add an #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER in
__init_rwsem() and in the optimistic spinning functions for rwsem-xadd?
Besides that:
Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-06 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 15:55 [PATCH 0/2] locking/rwsem: disable optimistic spinning for PA-RISC Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] locking/rwsem: Add CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 17:13 ` Jason Low [this message]
2014-06-06 18:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 18:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 19:08 ` Jason Low
2014-06-06 19:20 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] locking/rwsem: Disable optimistic spinning for PA-RISC Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-06 16:09 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 17:19 ` Chris Metcalf
2014-06-06 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-06 17:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-06 17:57 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 17:58 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-16 19:24 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some architectures tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-17 11:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-17 11:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-18 3:07 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-18 3:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402074788.6680.50.camel@j-VirtualBox \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox