From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966171AbaFTSjV (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:39:21 -0400 Received: from g4t3425.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.53]:40890 "EHLO g4t3425.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757042AbaFTSjU (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:39:20 -0400 Message-ID: <1403289003.25108.3.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86,mem-hotplug: modify PGD entry when removing memory From: Toshi Kani To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:30:03 -0600 In-Reply-To: <53A133ED.2090005@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <53A132E2.9000605@jp.fujitsu.com> <53A133ED.2090005@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 (3.8.5-2.fc19) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:38 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: : > @@ -186,7 +186,12 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) > const pgd_t *pgd_ref = pgd_offset_k(address); > struct page *page; > > - if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref)) > + /* > + * When it is called after memory hot remove, pgd_none() > + * returns true. In this case (removed == 1), we must clear > + * the PGD entries in the local PGD level page. > + */ > + if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref) && !removed) > continue; > > spin_lock(&pgd_lock); > @@ -199,12 +204,18 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) > pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock; > spin_lock(pgt_lock); > > - if (pgd_none(*pgd)) > - set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_ref); > - else > + if (!pgd_none(*pgd_ref) && !pgd_none(*pgd)) > BUG_ON(pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd) > != pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd_ref)); > > + if (removed) { Shouldn't this condition be "else if"? Thanks, -Toshi > + if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref) && !pgd_none(*pgd)) > + pgd_clear(pgd); > + } else { > + if (pgd_none(*pgd)) > + set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_ref); > + } > + > spin_unlock(pgt_lock); > }