public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	"'Alexey Lugovskoy'" <lugovskoy@dev.rtsoft.ru>,
	Konstantin Kholopov <kkholopov@dev.rtsoft.ru>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.10-rt / v3.12-rt] scheduling while atomic in cgroup code
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:09:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403338188.6766.6.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A50218.6020506@dev.rtsoft.ru>

On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 07:55 +0400, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: 
> Hi.
> 
> Call Trace:
> [e22d5a90] [c0007ea8] show_stack+0x4c/0x168 (unreliable)
> [e22d5ad0] [c0618c04] __schedule_bug+0x94/0xb0
> [e22d5ae0] [c060b9ec] __schedule+0x530/0x550
> [e22d5bf0] [c060bacc] schedule+0x30/0xbc
> [e22d5c00] [c060ca24] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x180/0x27c
> [e22d5c70] [c00b39dc] res_counter_uncharge_until+0x40/0xc4
> [e22d5ca0] [c013ca88] drain_stock.isra.20+0x54/0x98
> [e22d5cc0] [c01402ac] __mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x2e8/0xbac
> [e22d5d70] [c01410d4] mem_cgroup_charge_common+0x3c/0x70
> [e22d5d90] [c0117284] __do_fault+0x38c/0x510
> [e22d5df0] [c011a5f4] handle_pte_fault+0x98/0x858
> [e22d5e50] [c060ed08] do_page_fault+0x42c/0x6fc
> [e22d5f40] [c000f5b4] handle_page_fault+0xc/0x80
> 
> What happens:
> 
> - refill_stock() calls get_cpu_var() and thus disables preemption until
> matching put_cpu_var() is called,
> 
> - then it calls drain_stock() -> res_counter_uncharge() ->
> res_counter_uncharge_until()
> 
> - and here we have spin_lock(), which under RT can sleep. Thus we have 
> sleeping with preemption disabled.
> 
> 
> Any ideas how to fix?

The below should work.. though not as well as turning it off.

mm, memcg: make refill_stock()/consume_stock() use get_cpu_light()

Nikita reported the following memcg scheduling while atomic bug:

Call Trace:
[e22d5a90] [c0007ea8] show_stack+0x4c/0x168 (unreliable)
[e22d5ad0] [c0618c04] __schedule_bug+0x94/0xb0
[e22d5ae0] [c060b9ec] __schedule+0x530/0x550
[e22d5bf0] [c060bacc] schedule+0x30/0xbc
[e22d5c00] [c060ca24] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x180/0x27c
[e22d5c70] [c00b39dc] res_counter_uncharge_until+0x40/0xc4
[e22d5ca0] [c013ca88] drain_stock.isra.20+0x54/0x98
[e22d5cc0] [c01402ac] __mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x2e8/0xbac
[e22d5d70] [c01410d4] mem_cgroup_charge_common+0x3c/0x70
[e22d5d90] [c0117284] __do_fault+0x38c/0x510
[e22d5df0] [c011a5f4] handle_pte_fault+0x98/0x858
[e22d5e50] [c060ed08] do_page_fault+0x42c/0x6fc
[e22d5f40] [c000f5b4] handle_page_fault+0xc/0x80

What happens:

   refill_stock()
      get_cpu_var()
      drain_stock()
         res_counter_uncharge()
            res_counter_uncharge_until()
               spin_lock() <== boom

Fix it by replacing get/put_cpu_var() with get/put_cpu_light().

Reported-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2398,16 +2398,18 @@ static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgr
 {
 	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
 	bool ret = true;
+	int cpu;
 
 	if (nr_pages > CHARGE_BATCH)
 		return false;
 
-	stock = &get_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
+	cpu = get_cpu_light();
+	stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
 	if (memcg == stock->cached && stock->nr_pages >= nr_pages)
 		stock->nr_pages -= nr_pages;
 	else /* need to call res_counter_charge */
 		ret = false;
-	put_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
+	put_cpu_light();
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2457,14 +2459,17 @@ static void __init memcg_stock_init(void
  */
 static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
 {
-	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &get_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
+	struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
+	int cpu = get_cpu_light();
+
+	stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
 
 	if (stock->cached != memcg) { /* reset if necessary */
 		drain_stock(stock);
 		stock->cached = memcg;
 	}
 	stock->nr_pages += nr_pages;
-	put_cpu_var(memcg_stock);
+	put_cpu_light();
 }
 
 /*



  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-21  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-21  3:55 [v3.10-rt / v3.12-rt] scheduling while atomic in cgroup code Nikita Yushchenko
2014-06-21  8:09 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-02-17  9:28   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1403338188.6766.6.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=kkholopov@dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lugovskoy@dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --cc=nyushchenko@dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox