From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] x86: initialize secondary CPU only if master CPU will wait for it
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:41:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403559665.25108.6.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403266991-12233-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 14:23 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Hang is observed on virtual machines during CPU hotplug,
> especially in big guests with many CPUs. (It reproducible
> more often if host is over-committed).
>
> It happens because master CPU gives up waiting on
> secondary CPU and allows it to run wild. As result
> AP causes locking or crashing system. For example
> as described here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/257
>
> If master CPU have sent STARTUP IPI successfully,
> and AP signalled to master CPU that it's ready
> to start initialization, make master CPU wait
> indefinitely till AP is onlined.
> To ensure that AP won't ever run wild, make it
> wait at early startup till master CPU confirms its
> intention to wait for AP. If AP doesn't respond in 10
> seconds, the master CPU will timeout and cancel
> AP onlining.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> ---
> v7:
> - fix stuck boot with non SMP config
> - fix stuck paravirtual Xen SMP boot with more than 1VCPU
> and CPU hotplug
> v6:
> - no changes
> v5:
> - add smp_mb() after clearing cpu_initialized_mask in do_boot_cpu()
> - add 10 sec timeout description into commit message.
> v4:
> - move commont code in cpu_init() for x32/x64 in shared
> helper function wait_formaster_cpu()
> - add WARN_ON(cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_initialized_mask))
> to wait_formaster_cpu()
> v3:
> - leave timeouts in do_boot_cpu(), so that master CPU
> won't hang if AP doesn't respond, use cpu_initialized_mask
> as a way for AP to signal to master CPU that it's ready
> to start initialzation.
> v2:
> - ammend comment in cpu_init()
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 29 ++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 99 +++++++++++++-----------------------------
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
For the changes under arch/x86/kernel (I'm not familiar with Xen):
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Thanks,
-Toshi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-20 12:23 [PATCH v7] x86: initialize secondary CPU only if master CPU will wait for it Igor Mammedov
2014-06-23 21:41 ` Toshi Kani [this message]
2014-06-24 17:25 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-02 9:26 ` Igor Mammedov
2014-08-04 10:44 ` Igor Mammedov
2014-08-28 11:57 ` Igor Mammedov
2014-09-16 10:58 ` [tip:x86/boot] x86/smpboot: Initialize " tip-bot for Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403559665.25108.6.camel@misato.fc.hp.com \
--to=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox