From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755785AbaFYJkO (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:40:14 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.4]:51578 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753893AbaFYJkJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:40:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1403689208.1960.40.camel@x220> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] Documentation: Fix typo 'CONFIG_AFS' From: Paul Bolle To: David Howells Cc: Jiri Kosina , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:40:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6075.1403687355@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <1403683888.1960.35.camel@x220> <6075.1403687355@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-2.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2014 09:40:08.0450 (UTC) FILETIME=[73B0F620:01CF9059] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:09 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Paul Bolle wrote: > > Perhaps AF_RXRPC should be dropped from this short list (it is selected > > if AFS_FS is set). But since I couldn't actually determine how AFS_FS > > and RXKAD interact I decided to not touch that list any further. > > The key_type_rxrpc key that the AFS fs or userspace passes to AF_RXRPC > indicates the protocol that AF_RXRPC should use. The AFS fs doesn't need to > care how the security actually works and the token is opaque to it. > > rxkad registers itself with AF_RXRPC, which maintains a list. The > security_index is the number that appears in the protocol that indicates the > security driver to use. Thanks. That would have taken me quite a bit of time to figure out. I'll leave that short list as is, unless you prefer that I send a v2 dropping AF_RXRPC. Paul Bolle