From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, pjt@google.com
Subject: [RFCv2 PATCH 11/23] sched: Introduce an unweighted cpu_load array
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 17:25:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404404770-323-12-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404404770-323-1-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Maintain an unweighted (uw) cpu_load array as the uw counterpart
of rq.cpu_load[].
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +++-
kernel/sched/proc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2d7544a..d814064 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7114,8 +7114,10 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
init_tg_rt_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, NULL);
#endif
- for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++) {
rq->cpu_load[j] = 0;
+ rq->uw_cpu_load[j] = 0;
+ }
rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index 16f5a30..2260092 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ decay_load_missed(unsigned long load, unsigned long missed_updates, int idx)
* every tick. We fix it up based on jiffies.
*/
static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
+ unsigned long uw_this_load,
unsigned long pending_updates)
{
int i, scale;
@@ -479,14 +480,20 @@ static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
/* Update our load: */
this_rq->cpu_load[0] = this_load; /* Fasttrack for idx 0 */
+ this_rq->uw_cpu_load[0] = uw_this_load; /* Fasttrack for idx 0 */
for (i = 1, scale = 2; i < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; i++, scale += scale) {
- unsigned long old_load, new_load;
+ unsigned long old_load, new_load, uw_old_load, uw_new_load;
/* scale is effectively 1 << i now, and >> i divides by scale */
old_load = this_rq->cpu_load[i];
old_load = decay_load_missed(old_load, pending_updates - 1, i);
new_load = this_load;
+
+ uw_old_load = this_rq->uw_cpu_load[i];
+ uw_old_load = decay_load_missed(uw_old_load,
+ pending_updates - 1, i);
+ uw_new_load = uw_this_load;
/*
* Round up the averaging division if load is increasing. This
* prevents us from getting stuck on 9 if the load is 10, for
@@ -494,8 +501,12 @@ static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
*/
if (new_load > old_load)
new_load += scale - 1;
+ if (uw_new_load > uw_old_load)
+ uw_new_load += scale - 1;
this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load * (scale - 1) + new_load) >> i;
+ this_rq->uw_cpu_load[i] = (uw_old_load * (scale - 1) +
+ uw_new_load) >> i;
}
sched_avg_update(this_rq);
@@ -535,6 +546,7 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
{
unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
unsigned long load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
+ unsigned long uw_load = this_rq->cfs.uw_runnable_load_avg;
unsigned long pending_updates;
/*
@@ -546,7 +558,7 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, pending_updates);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, uw_load, pending_updates);
}
/*
@@ -569,7 +581,7 @@ void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
* We were idle, this means load 0, the current load might be
* !0 due to remote wakeups and the sort.
*/
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, 0, pending_updates);
}
raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
}
@@ -581,11 +593,13 @@ void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq)
{
unsigned long load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
+ unsigned long uw_load = this_rq->cfs.uw_runnable_load_avg;
+
/*
* See the mess around update_idle_cpu_load() / update_cpu_load_nohz().
*/
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, 1);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, uw_load, 1);
calc_load_account_active(this_rq);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index d7d2ee2..455d152 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ struct rq {
#endif
#define CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX 5
unsigned long cpu_load[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX];
+ unsigned long uw_cpu_load[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX];
unsigned long last_load_update_tick;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
u64 nohz_stamp;
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-03 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 16:25 [RFCv2 PATCH 00/23] sched: Energy cost model for energy-aware scheduling Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 01/23] sched: Documentation for scheduler energy cost model Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-24 0:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-24 7:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-24 14:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-24 17:57 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 02/23] sched: Make energy awareness a sched feature Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 03/23] sched: Introduce energy data structures Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 04/23] sched: Allocate and initialize " Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 05/23] sched: Add energy procfs interface Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 06/23] arm: topology: Define TC2 energy and provide it to the scheduler Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 07/23] sched: Introduce system-wide sched_energy Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 08/23] sched: Aggregate unweighted load contributed by task entities on parenting cfs_rq Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 23:50 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 09/23] sched: Maintain the unweighted load contribution of blocked entities Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 10/23] sched: Account for blocked unweighted load waking back up Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:25 ` Morten Rasmussen [this message]
2014-07-03 16:25 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 12/23] sched: Rename weighted_cpuload() to cpu_load() Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 13/23] sched: Introduce weighted/unweighted switch in load related functions Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 14/23] sched: Introduce SD_SHARE_CAP_STATES sched_domain flag Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 15/23] sched, cpufreq: Introduce current cpu compute capacity into scheduler Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 16/23] sched, cpufreq: Current compute capacity hack for ARM TC2 Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 17/23] sched: Likely idle state statistics placeholder Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 18/23] sched: Energy model functions Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 19/23] sched: Task wakeup tracking Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 20/23] sched: Take task wakeups into account in energy estimates Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 21/23] sched: Use energy model in select_idle_sibling Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 22/23] sched: Use energy to guide wakeup task placement Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 16:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 23/23] sched: Use energy model in load balance path Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-03 23:19 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 00/23] sched: Energy cost model for energy-aware scheduling Yuyang Du
2014-07-04 11:06 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-04 16:03 ` Anca Emanuel
2014-07-06 19:05 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-07 14:16 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-08 0:23 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-08 9:28 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-04 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-07 14:00 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-07 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1404404770-323-12-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--to=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).