From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Kconfig: Select SPMI when REGMAP_SPMI is selected
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:00:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405519254.31919.24.camel@iivanov-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140716135345.GA508@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 06:26:15PM +0530, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>
> Fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, this will make your
> mails more legible - see Documentation/email-clients.txt.
>
> > On Wednesday, 16 July, 2014 5:55pm, "Stanimir Varbanov" <svarbanov@mm-sol.com> said:
>
> > The CONFIG_SPMI option is visible in menuconfig hence either it should
> > be set by default in multi_v7_defconfig(like in qcom_defconfig) or
> > driver owner should mention a 'depneds on CONFIG_SPMI' as suggested by
> > Lars-Peter Clausen.
>
> > I prefer the former (defconfig).
>
> No, this isn't an either/or thing - the dependency is absolutely
> mandatory if the device needs SPMI. The defconfigs are a separate
> thing, they just exist to give people a starting point for configuring
> their kernel so if the device using SPMI is important for relevant
> systems the defconfig needs to be set up to enable it but that's
> separate to the dependency since there's no need for people to ever even
> look at defconfigs.
Then config REGMAP_SPMI should depend on SPMI, right?
Regards,
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 11:39 [PATCH] regmap: Kconfig: Select SPMI when REGMAP_SPMI is selected pramod.gurav.etc
2014-07-16 12:07 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2014-07-16 12:14 ` Pramod Gurav
2014-07-16 12:25 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2014-07-16 12:56 ` Pramod Gurav
2014-07-16 13:53 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2014-07-16 13:53 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-16 14:00 ` Ivan T. Ivanov [this message]
2014-07-16 14:18 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-16 14:42 ` pramod gurav
2014-07-16 14:48 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-16 12:19 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405519254.31919.24.camel@iivanov-dev \
--to=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=joshc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com \
--cc=pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com \
--cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox