From: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78]
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 04:39:07 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14055702.547701.1364891947331.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402073035.GD3670@kernel.dk>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>
> To: "Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>
> Cc: "CAI Qian" <caiqian@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com, "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 3:30:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78]
>
> On Tue, Apr 02 2013, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02 2013, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > [Added jens Axboe to CC]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:08:49AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
> > > > Saw on almost all the servers range from x64, ppc64 and s390x with
> > > > kernel
> > > > 3.9-rc5 and xfsprogs-3.1.10. Never caught this in 3.9-rc4, so looks
> > > > like
> > > > something new broke this. Log is here with sysrq debug info.
> > > > http://people.redhat.com/qcai/stable/log
> >
> > CAI Qian, can you try and back the below out and test again?
>
> Nevermind, it's clearly that one. The below should improve the
> situation, but it's not pretty. A better fix would be to allow
> auto-deletion even if PART_NO_SCAN is set.
Jens, when compiled the mainline (up to fefcdbe) with this patch,
it error-ed out,
drivers/block/loop.c: In function ‘loop_clr_fd’:
drivers/block/loop.c:1067:3: error: too many arguments to function ‘mutex_trylock’
In file included from include/linux/notifier.h:13:0,
from include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:6,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:771,
from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
from include/linux/kmod.h:22,
from include/linux/module.h:13,
from drivers/block/loop.c:52:
include/linux/mutex.h:168:12: note: declared here
drivers/block/loop.c: At top level:
drivers/block/loop.c:1084:2: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default]
drivers/block/loop.c:1084:2: warning: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘fput’ [-Wimplicit-int]
drivers/block/loop.c:1084:2: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [enabled by default]
drivers/block/loop.c:1084:2: error: conflicting types for ‘fput’
In file included from drivers/block/loop.c:56:0:
include/linux/file.h:14:13: note: previous declaration of ‘fput’ was here
drivers/block/loop.c:1085:2: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘return’
drivers/block/loop.c:1086:1: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘}’ token
CC crypto/gf128mul.o
CC lib/sort.o
drivers/block/loop.c: In function ‘loop_clr_fd’:
drivers/block/loop.c:1076:2: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
CC lib/parser.o
CC [M] sound/pci/atiixp.o
make[2]: *** [drivers/block/loop.o] Error 1
CAI Qian
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index fe5f640..d6c5764 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1057,14 +1057,15 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
> struct disk_part_iter piter;
> struct hd_struct *part;
>
> - mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, 1);
> - invalidate_partition(bdev->bd_disk, 0);
> - disk_part_iter_init(&piter, bdev->bd_disk,
> - DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY);
> - while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
> - delete_partition(bdev->bd_disk, part->partno);
> - disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
> - mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> + if (mutex_trylock(&bdev->bd_mutex, 1))
> + invalidate_partition(bdev->bd_disk, 0);
> + disk_part_iter_init(&piter, bdev->bd_disk,
> + DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY);
> + while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter)))
> + delete_partition(bdev->bd_disk, part->partno);
> + disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
> + mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1462091996.435156.1364882416199.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-04-02 6:08 ` xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78 CAI Qian
2013-04-02 7:05 ` Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78] Dave Chinner
2013-04-02 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 8:39 ` CAI Qian [this message]
2013-04-02 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-02 9:31 ` CAI Qian
2013-04-02 9:48 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-03 11:41 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-03 15:41 ` Phillip Susi
2013-04-04 20:30 ` Phillip Susi
2013-04-09 6:55 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 7:01 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-09 7:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 7:24 ` Jens Axboe
2013-05-28 14:51 ` Phillip Susi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14055702.547701.1364891947331.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox