linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:10:50 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406146251-8540-8-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406146251-8540-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br>

Ensure that both the microcode data_size and total_size fields are a
multiple of the dword size (4 bytes).  The Intel SDM vol 3A (order code
253668-051US, June 2014) requires this to be true, and the driver code
assumes it will be true.

Add a comment to the code stating that it is best if we continue to
refrain from ensuring that total_size is a multiple of 1024 bytes.  The
reason to never add that check is non-obvious.

Refuse a microcode with a revision of zero, we reserve that for the
factory-provided microcode.

Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
index 95c2d19..050cd4f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
@@ -61,12 +61,22 @@ int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
 	total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
 	data_size = get_datasize(mc_header);
 
-	if (data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE > total_size) {
+	if ((data_size % DWSIZE) || (total_size % DWSIZE) ||
+	    (data_size + MC_HEADER_SIZE > total_size)) {
 		if (print_err)
-			pr_err("error! Bad data size in microcode data file\n");
+			pr_err("error! Bad data size or total size in microcode data file\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * DO NOT add a check for total_size to be a multiple of 1024.
+	 *
+	 * While there is a requirement that total_size be a multiple of 1024
+	 * (Intel SDM vol 3A, section 9.11.1, table 9-6, page 9-29), it clashes
+	 * with the "delete extended signature table" procedure described for
+	 * the Checksum[n] field in the same table 9-6, at page 9-30).
+	 */
+
 	ext_table_size = total_size - (MC_HEADER_SIZE + data_size);
 	if (ext_table_size) {
 		if ((ext_table_size < EXT_HEADER_SIZE)
@@ -84,6 +94,13 @@ int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
 		ext_sigcount = ext_header->count;
 	}
 
+	/* check some of the metadata */
+	if (mc_header->rev == 0) { /* reserved for silicon microcode */
+		if (print_err)
+			pr_err("error! Restricted revision 0 in microcode data file\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/* check extended table checksum */
 	if (ext_table_size) {
 		int ext_table_sum = 0;
-- 
1.7.10.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-23 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-23 20:10 [PATCH 0/8] x86, microcode: cosmetic and minor issue fixes Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, microcode, amd: fix missing static declaration Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix missing static declarations Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix typos Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix missing declaration Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 11:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 14:27     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 18:23   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: rename apply_microcode and declare it static Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-25 16:23     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't use fields from unknown format header Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 11:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 13:30     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 14:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 15:07         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 16:29           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 17:49             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86, microcode, intel: total_size is valid only when data_size != 0 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-25 16:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-25 19:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 14:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-28 15:39         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2014-07-28 15:31   ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata Borislav Petkov
2014-07-28 19:37     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-29 10:45       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-29 20:25         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-04 11:09           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-04 20:18             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-08 12:54               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-08 13:50                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-08 15:21                   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-08 15:45                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, microcode, intel: correct extended signature checksum verification Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 20:36   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:55 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, amd: Fix missing static declaration tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:55 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Add missing static declarations tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Fix typos tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Rename apply_microcode and declare it static tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Fix total_size computation tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1406146251-8540-8-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).