* [PATCH] staging: rtl8192ee: checkpatch: use tabs for indent
@ 2014-08-03 16:06 Martin Kepplinger
2014-08-03 16:27 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Kepplinger @ 2014-08-03 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: Larry.Finger, linux-kernel, Martin Kepplinger
Use tabs for code indent and use the kernel coding style.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
---
applies to -next20140801
drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
index 7272fae..7841447 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
@@ -363,8 +363,7 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select(
static int _rtl92e_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg,
struct wiphy *wiphy,
void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
- struct regulatory_request *
- request))
+ struct regulatory_request *request))
{
const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192ee: checkpatch: use tabs for indent
2014-08-03 16:06 [PATCH] staging: rtl8192ee: checkpatch: use tabs for indent Martin Kepplinger
@ 2014-08-03 16:27 ` Joe Perches
2014-08-03 16:38 ` Martin Kepplinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-08-03 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Kepplinger; +Cc: gregkh, Larry.Finger, linux-kernel
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 18:06 +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> Use tabs for code indent and use the kernel coding style.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
[]
> @@ -363,8 +363,7 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select(
> static int _rtl92e_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg,
> struct wiphy *wiphy,
> void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> - struct regulatory_request *
> - request))
> + struct regulatory_request *request))
> {
> const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd;
>
It seems that was done to keep the alignment of the function
pointer arguments to the open parenthesis.
If I were to do anything, it'd be to move the static int
to a separate line and unindent the block a little
For this file, maybe something like this:
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
index 7272fae..4fcb5f0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
@@ -46,99 +46,99 @@ static struct country_code_to_enum_rd allcountries[] = {
*Only these channels all allow active
*scan on all world regulatory domains
*/
-#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
+#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
REG_RULE(2412-10, 2462+10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
/*
*We enable active scan on these a case
*by case basis by regulatory domain
*/
-#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
- REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20,\
- NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
+#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
+ REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20, \
+ NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
-#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14 \
- REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
- NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
- NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
+#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14 \
+ REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
+ NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
+ NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
/* 5G chan 36 - chan 64*/
-#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350 \
- REG_RULE(5150-10, 5350+10, 80, 0, 30, \
- NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
- NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
+#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350 \
+ REG_RULE(5150-10, 5350+10, 80, 0, 30, \
+ NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
+ NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
/* 5G chan 100 - chan 165*/
-#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5470_5850 \
- REG_RULE(5470-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
- NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
- NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
+#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5470_5850 \
+ REG_RULE(5470-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
+ NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
+ NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
/* 5G chan 149 - chan 165*/
-#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850 \
- REG_RULE(5725-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
- NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
- NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
+#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850 \
+ REG_RULE(5725-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
+ NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
+ NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
-#define RTL819x_5GHZ_ALL \
+#define RTL819x_5GHZ_ALL \
(RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350, RTL819x_5GHZ_5470_5850)
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_11 = {
.n_reg_rules = 1,
.alpha2 = "99",
.reg_rules = {
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
- }
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
+ }
};
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_12_13 = {
.n_reg_rules = 2,
.alpha2 = "99",
.reg_rules = {
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
- }
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
+ }
};
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_no_midband = {
.n_reg_rules = 3,
.alpha2 = "99",
.reg_rules = {
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
- RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350,
- RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
- }
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
+ RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350,
+ RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
+ }
};
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_60_64 = {
.n_reg_rules = 3,
.alpha2 = "99",
.reg_rules = {
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
- RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
- }
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
+ RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
+ }
};
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_14_60_64 = {
.n_reg_rules = 4,
.alpha2 = "99",
.reg_rules = {
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
- RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
- }
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
+ RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
+ }
};
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_14 = {
.n_reg_rules = 3,
.alpha2 = "99",
.reg_rules = {
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
- RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
- }
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
+ RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
+ }
};
static bool _rtl_is_radar_freq(u16 center_freq)
@@ -146,8 +146,9 @@ static bool _rtl_is_radar_freq(u16 center_freq)
return center_freq >= 5260 && center_freq <= 5700;
}
-static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
- enum nl80211_reg_initiator initiator)
+static void
+_rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ enum nl80211_reg_initiator initiator)
{
enum ieee80211_band band;
struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
@@ -186,20 +187,20 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
if (!(reg_rule->flags &
NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN))
ch->flags &=
- ~IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN;
+ ~IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN;
} else {
if (ch->beacon_found)
ch->flags &= ~(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS |
- IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN);
+ IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN);
}
}
}
}
/* Allows active scan scan on Ch 12 and 13 */
-static void _rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
- enum nl80211_reg_initiator
- initiator)
+static void
+_rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ enum nl80211_reg_initiator initiator)
{
struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
struct ieee80211_channel *ch;
@@ -279,9 +280,9 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_radar_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
*do not allow AP mode
*/
if (!(ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED))
- ch->flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
- IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS |
- IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN;
+ ch->flags |= (IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
+ IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS |
+ IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN);
}
}
@@ -332,8 +333,8 @@ static int _rtl92e_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
return 0;
}
-static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select(
- struct rtl_regulatory *reg)
+static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *
+_rtl_regdomain_select(struct rtl_regulatory *reg)
{
switch (reg->country_code) {
case COUNTRY_CODE_FCC:
@@ -360,11 +361,10 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select(
}
}
-static int _rtl92e_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg,
- struct wiphy *wiphy,
- void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
- struct regulatory_request *
- request))
+static int
+_rtl92e_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg, struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
+ struct regulatory_request *request))
{
const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192ee: checkpatch: use tabs for indent
2014-08-03 16:27 ` Joe Perches
@ 2014-08-03 16:38 ` Martin Kepplinger
2014-08-03 16:49 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Kepplinger @ 2014-08-03 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches; +Cc: gregkh, Larry.Finger, linux-kernel
Am 2014-08-03 18:27, schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 18:06 +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
>> Use tabs for code indent and use the kernel coding style.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
> []
>> @@ -363,8 +363,7 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select(
>> static int _rtl92e_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg,
>> struct wiphy *wiphy,
>> void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
>> - struct regulatory_request *
>> - request))
>> + struct regulatory_request *request))
>> {
>> const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd;
>>
>
> It seems that was done to keep the alignment of the function
> pointer arguments to the open parenthesis.
>
> If I were to do anything, it'd be to move the static int
> to a separate line and unindent the block a little
>
> For this file, maybe something like this:
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
> index 7272fae..4fcb5f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/regd.c
> @@ -46,99 +46,99 @@ static struct country_code_to_enum_rd allcountries[] = {
> *Only these channels all allow active
> *scan on all world regulatory domains
> */
> -#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
> +#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11 \
> REG_RULE(2412-10, 2462+10, 40, 0, 20, 0)
>
> /*
> *We enable active scan on these a case
> *by case basis by regulatory domain
> */
> -#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
> - REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20,\
> - NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
> +#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13 \
> + REG_RULE(2467-10, 2472+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> + NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN)
>
> -#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14 \
> - REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> - NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> - NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
> +#define RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14 \
> + REG_RULE(2484-10, 2484+10, 40, 0, 20, \
> + NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> + NL80211_RRF_NO_OFDM)
>
> /* 5G chan 36 - chan 64*/
> -#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350 \
> - REG_RULE(5150-10, 5350+10, 80, 0, 30, \
> - NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> - NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
> +#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350 \
> + REG_RULE(5150-10, 5350+10, 80, 0, 30, \
> + NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> + NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
>
> /* 5G chan 100 - chan 165*/
> -#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5470_5850 \
> - REG_RULE(5470-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
> - NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> - NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
> +#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5470_5850 \
> + REG_RULE(5470-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
> + NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> + NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
>
> /* 5G chan 149 - chan 165*/
> -#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850 \
> - REG_RULE(5725-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
> - NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> - NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
> +#define RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850 \
> + REG_RULE(5725-10, 5850+10, 80, 0, 30, \
> + NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN | \
> + NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS)
>
> -#define RTL819x_5GHZ_ALL \
> +#define RTL819x_5GHZ_ALL \
> (RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350, RTL819x_5GHZ_5470_5850)
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_11 = {
> .n_reg_rules = 1,
> .alpha2 = "99",
> .reg_rules = {
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> - }
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> + }
> };
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_12_13 = {
> .n_reg_rules = 2,
> .alpha2 = "99",
> .reg_rules = {
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> - }
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> + }
> };
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_no_midband = {
> .n_reg_rules = 3,
> .alpha2 = "99",
> .reg_rules = {
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> - RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350,
> - RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
> - }
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> + RTL819x_5GHZ_5150_5350,
> + RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
> + }
> };
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_60_64 = {
> .n_reg_rules = 3,
> .alpha2 = "99",
> .reg_rules = {
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> - RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
> - }
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> + RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
> + }
> };
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_14_60_64 = {
> .n_reg_rules = 4,
> .alpha2 = "99",
> .reg_rules = {
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
> - RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
> - }
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
> + RTL819x_5GHZ_5725_5850,
> + }
> };
>
> static const struct ieee80211_regdomain rtl_regdom_14 = {
> .n_reg_rules = 3,
> .alpha2 = "99",
> .reg_rules = {
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> - RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
> - }
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH01_11,
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH12_13,
> + RTL819x_2GHZ_CH14,
> + }
> };
>
> static bool _rtl_is_radar_freq(u16 center_freq)
> @@ -146,8 +146,9 @@ static bool _rtl_is_radar_freq(u16 center_freq)
> return center_freq >= 5260 && center_freq <= 5700;
> }
>
> -static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> - enum nl80211_reg_initiator initiator)
> +static void
> +_rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + enum nl80211_reg_initiator initiator)
> {
> enum ieee80211_band band;
> struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
> @@ -186,20 +187,20 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_beaconing_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> if (!(reg_rule->flags &
> NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN))
> ch->flags &=
> - ~IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN;
> + ~IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN;
> } else {
> if (ch->beacon_found)
> ch->flags &= ~(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS |
> - IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN);
> + IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN);
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> /* Allows active scan scan on Ch 12 and 13 */
> -static void _rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> - enum nl80211_reg_initiator
> - initiator)
> +static void
> +_rtl_reg_apply_active_scan_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + enum nl80211_reg_initiator initiator)
> {
> struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband;
> struct ieee80211_channel *ch;
> @@ -279,9 +280,9 @@ static void _rtl_reg_apply_radar_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
> *do not allow AP mode
> */
> if (!(ch->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED))
> - ch->flags |= IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
> - IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS |
> - IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN;
> + ch->flags |= (IEEE80211_CHAN_RADAR |
> + IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS |
> + IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -332,8 +333,8 @@ static int _rtl92e_reg_notifier_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select(
> - struct rtl_regulatory *reg)
> +static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *
> +_rtl_regdomain_select(struct rtl_regulatory *reg)
> {
> switch (reg->country_code) {
> case COUNTRY_CODE_FCC:
> @@ -360,11 +361,10 @@ static const struct ieee80211_regdomain *_rtl_regdomain_select(
> }
> }
>
> -static int _rtl92e_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg,
> - struct wiphy *wiphy,
> - void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> - struct regulatory_request *
> - request))
> +static int
> +_rtl92e_regd_init_wiphy(struct rtl_regulatory *reg, struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + void (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + struct regulatory_request *request))
> {
> const struct ieee80211_regdomain *regd;
>
>
I'd rather have the return value on the same line than aligned
parameters but that's taste. Either way looks better and satisfies
checkpatch, which is the only goal.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192ee: checkpatch: use tabs for indent
2014-08-03 16:38 ` Martin Kepplinger
@ 2014-08-03 16:49 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-08-03 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Kepplinger; +Cc: gregkh, Larry.Finger, linux-kernel
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 18:38 +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> I'd rather have the return value on the same line than aligned
> parameters but that's taste. Either way looks better and satisfies
> checkpatch, which is the only goal.
Satisfying checkpatch should not be high on the goal list.
Consistent readability should be though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-03 16:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-03 16:06 [PATCH] staging: rtl8192ee: checkpatch: use tabs for indent Martin Kepplinger
2014-08-03 16:27 ` Joe Perches
2014-08-03 16:38 ` Martin Kepplinger
2014-08-03 16:49 ` Joe Perches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).